Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents
- Thread starter nitro
- Start date
Checkmate. ---Now that the day has been won, it's time to turn back to more current and important issues.--Izzy
what are you talking about. Show us peer reviewed journals which have proved we are warming outside natural variation?
then show us peer reviewed journals saying the warming is caused by co2.
The educated non propagandist world is moving away from your leftist meme... towards a more rational position of skepticism because there is a lack of scientific evidence. Which is part of the reason Trump was elected. The lefts lie if a servers a purpose trick is being rejected.
then show us peer reviewed journals saying the warming is caused by co2.
The educated non propagandist world is moving away from your leftist meme... towards a more rational position of skepticism because there is a lack of scientific evidence. Which is part of the reason Trump was elected. The lefts lie if a servers a purpose trick is being rejected.
It's quite obvious that the deniers do not know what a greenhouse gas is. Just incredible ignorance and/or intellectual dishonesty from them.
And note that temps have done the same thing. Because CO2 is a GHG. Which the denier liars pretend to not understand.
And note that temps have done the same thing. Because CO2 is a GHG. Which the denier liars pretend to not understand.
Speaking of tribalism. I think it describes the motives of the deniers pretty well. They need that pack identity to calm their overactive amygdalas.
No, they are not. No, it did not.
Can anything, I mean anything in this world or a world in the alt-right universe, stop futurecurrents?
China to Trump: Climate Change Is Not a Chinese Hoax
2 / 24
U.S. News & World Report
Curt Mills 3 hrs ago
© (Evan Vucci/AP) As the COP22 climate change conference is underway in Marrakech, Morocco, a Chinese foreign ministry official refuted past claims by President-elect Donald Trump that climate change is a Chinese hoax.
A Chinese foreign ministry official took President-elect Donald Trump to task Wednesday for his past claim that climate change was a Chinese hoax.
"If you look at the history of climate change negotiations, actually it was initiated by the IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] with the support of the Republicans during the Reagan and senior Bush administration during the late 1980s," said Liu Zhenmin, China's vice foreign minister, speaking with reporters in Morocco at the ongoing U.N. climate talks.
In November 2012, Trump tweeted: "The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive."
The claim became an issue in the U.S. presidential election, when Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton brought it up in a debate.
"I did not — I did not — I do not say that. I do not say that," Trump responded, in a comment Politifact rated as "mostly false." The fact-checker hedged slightly because Trump later dismissed the tweet as a joke in early 2016, but noted he said "a lot of" climate change is a hoax as recently as December 2015....
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...e-is-not-a-chinese-hoax/ar-AAkq7jI?li=BBnb7Kz
China to Trump: Climate Change Is Not a Chinese Hoax
2 / 24
U.S. News & World Report
Curt Mills 3 hrs ago
© (Evan Vucci/AP) As the COP22 climate change conference is underway in Marrakech, Morocco, a Chinese foreign ministry official refuted past claims by President-elect Donald Trump that climate change is a Chinese hoax.
A Chinese foreign ministry official took President-elect Donald Trump to task Wednesday for his past claim that climate change was a Chinese hoax.
"If you look at the history of climate change negotiations, actually it was initiated by the IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] with the support of the Republicans during the Reagan and senior Bush administration during the late 1980s," said Liu Zhenmin, China's vice foreign minister, speaking with reporters in Morocco at the ongoing U.N. climate talks.
In November 2012, Trump tweeted: "The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive."
The claim became an issue in the U.S. presidential election, when Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton brought it up in a debate.
"I did not — I did not — I do not say that. I do not say that," Trump responded, in a comment Politifact rated as "mostly false." The fact-checker hedged slightly because Trump later dismissed the tweet as a joke in early 2016, but noted he said "a lot of" climate change is a hoax as recently as December 2015....
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...e-is-not-a-chinese-hoax/ar-AAkq7jI?li=BBnb7Kz
Seems like far steeper emissions curve than accumulation.
might that be because we have peer reviewed science showing atmsopheric levels of CO2 have been shown to follow the change in ocean temps and we know that ocean temps have been rising?
might that be because we have peer reviewed science showing atmsopheric levels of CO2 have been shown to follow the change in ocean temps and we know that ocean temps have been rising?
It's quite obvious that the deniers do not know what a greenhouse gas is. Just incredible ignorance and/or intellectual dishonesty from them.
And note that temps have done the same thing. Because CO2 is a GHG. Which the denier liars pretend to not understand.
Are You lying? or being a troll. If you had any science that scientist would have a nobel prize.
So far every time you have made that claim you have failed to produce peer reviewed science showing man made co2 is causing warming.
So now I challenge you to show us peer review science showing we are warming outside natural variation.
Give us the link it should take one minute or less. If you have read it, you will see it must be based on faulty models or assumptions.
So far every time you have made that claim you have failed to produce peer reviewed science showing man made co2 is causing warming.
So now I challenge you to show us peer review science showing we are warming outside natural variation.
Give us the link it should take one minute or less. If you have read it, you will see it must be based on faulty models or assumptions.