The method that Romik is using is a variation on the Turtle Trading Method. Only, instead of looking for breakouts and piling in up to a certain limit as the position moves in his favor, he takes the turns that the market gives him and increases position size with each ensuring turn.
In a way, it's a methodology which is more in-tune with how the ES trades, anyway (65-70% chop/35-30% trend). If he were to increase the number of markets followed and allocate his trades per market up to his 2% (or 4% or whatever) maximum you would see the exact same money management as the turtles use. This is probably the only scenario such a technique should be used, however.
In this case, as with the Turtles, the money management is the edge.
***
I looked into CFD's when I first started trading, you can do very interesting things with them in terms of hedging a position in the exact same contract, as well as taking offsetting positions in different indices with similar volatility and point size (cumulative).
If you also do range and volatility studies of the contract(s) you follow, such stratagems would be ideal.
There's also a mini version of the contract which allows you to test out different strategies with money on the line, but incurring no real losses (one step better than testing strategies with a SIM).
***
All-in-all, I see nothing wrong with any of the above items, they represent another way of skinning the cat, which is what you are going to have to do any if you want to win in this extremely competitive business.
Good Trading,
JJ
In a way, it's a methodology which is more in-tune with how the ES trades, anyway (65-70% chop/35-30% trend). If he were to increase the number of markets followed and allocate his trades per market up to his 2% (or 4% or whatever) maximum you would see the exact same money management as the turtles use. This is probably the only scenario such a technique should be used, however.
In this case, as with the Turtles, the money management is the edge.
***
I looked into CFD's when I first started trading, you can do very interesting things with them in terms of hedging a position in the exact same contract, as well as taking offsetting positions in different indices with similar volatility and point size (cumulative).
If you also do range and volatility studies of the contract(s) you follow, such stratagems would be ideal.
There's also a mini version of the contract which allows you to test out different strategies with money on the line, but incurring no real losses (one step better than testing strategies with a SIM).
***
All-in-all, I see nothing wrong with any of the above items, they represent another way of skinning the cat, which is what you are going to have to do any if you want to win in this extremely competitive business.
Good Trading,
JJ