Quote from Haroki:
Well, I know I'm technically correct, thanks. But you watch, Cryer will behave just like the delusional lunatics we find in here. When asked about court cases that back what he's claiming, he'll give cases, etc. And I admittedly have no way to know what the fuck he's talking about, except in a few exceptions, like Brushaber, etc. ANd when he does quote them, he'll lie about what the decision in the case is about - he'll say that the decision affirms that the 16th gave no new taxing power, and therefore we can't be taxed, but neglect to mention that Brushaber LOST the case.
Haroki,
don't make excuses already man.And could you imagine if Tommy pointed out something you don't understand ,and after investigating it, you find out that he was correct? Could that even be possible Haroki in your mind?