Quote from sheda:
"When the red crosses the blue, the RSI and Stochastic are at x Go long"
The markets are a fluid on going development with a million if and buts yet just enough coherency to get by, I am going to be honest with you when I say I did not think you would be arguing against such systems. I have always assumed they were a crutch used until enough screen time has been invested to subconsiously react to what one is seeing in the market, used as a frame work to note how the market reacts around it, its indiscrepancies and so forth. A set of rules to focus on while you learn the market in relation to them and by doing so you learn the behaviour of the market.
I mentioned above that I can not articulate the way I trade 100%, I liken it to driving, the controls of a vehicle are standardized, there are fixed mechanical rules to follow concerning gas steering and braking etc. There is a code of conduct to follow while interacting with other traffic yet every situation is new. We may drive down the same roads every day with the same vehicles surrounding us and despite the code of conduct and fixed mechanical rules all drivers are operating under any trip has the potential to be anything from the mundane to life threatening.
How we are able to read and react to these situations is a product of our expereince, even when faced with a situation we have never come across, if we are expereinced enough we can react to it, yet we may not know why we reacted that way, why we sensed something was up.
Having fixed rules for every situation with trading is as bizzare as having fixed rules of response for every single situation one comes across when driving, there are vital rules needed with both but you can never legislate every response beyond those vital few, it would restrict your response in fatal ways, experience and the actions born out of that expereince are the only things we can rely on.
If people really do buy/create such inflexible systems, blow an account and simply go on to get another system, then another, looking for the "holy grail" of trading, without paying attention to the raw market unfolding infront of them, then our old boy EMG is out of a job isent he, as 100% of those who do a skydive without a parachute die to.
Point being I did not think you would be arguing about the obvious and Xpurts combination of TA/chart reading and producing a game plan for the current market hes seeing does not equate to this crap, although they do get complex. The above is not to say if you have a dam good method it cant be taught however, it depends on the individual.
Buffet does not use a chart, surely its down to the indivdual?
http://dc589.2shared.com/download/KLk0WtT7/ABC.png?tsid=20130428-052429-91eb53dd
I would not have entered this in 2009 on the say so of two lines but I wouldt have entered it without taking the chart into consideration either, fundamentals etc are fantastic but you can still enter on the edge of a
Peace.
Thanks for the explanation. Predatory genetic adaptive HFT has changed market structure forever regardless of what the charties state. One form or another of HFT is now 70% of all market volume--- Getting down to brass tacks and just the facts/- if you are a gifted market savant, maybe you can "read" charts to profits and wealth. I really have no way of knowing. Other than asking, are you wealthy from trading? If not, why not and have you considered your core beliefs/ methods may be fatally flawed? This isn't directly to you but to all of the chart TA traders. Man, there is tremendous wealth every second flowing about the market, have you taken enough for your own wealth? Maybe it's time to reevaluate why not, if not. Rhetoric will only prevail on message boards, your account knows the real truth. Peace, surf
