You said you’re waiting for more reporting but link to an opinion piece. Where’s the reporting?
Did the American KGB place a mole in the Trump campaign?
- Thread starter TreeFrogTrader
- Start date
You said you’re waiting for more reporting but link to an opinion piece. Where’s the reporting?
Yeh, right ...because the mainstream media immediately picks up stories that are anti-clinton and fbi stories. NOT.
They ran like a rocket with the dossier story when it broke. Hard and fast. Then when it led to the clintonistas, they ran the other way and it suddenly became tin foil stuff. Funny dat.
MORE TO COME.
Last edited:
So, to be clear, there is no actual reporting.
Like the birthers,you'll eventually have to accept reality
Note that the title of my thread ASKS whether the fbi had a mole in the Trump campaign and has a question mark at the end of it.
Thus, leaving room for further developments or confirmations or denials and reporting.
There are documents being released and other house intel investigations that need to be processed to know more. I would follow any leads that go where you dont want to go. You are not the one to decide what gets looked at further, which is why more and more is being revealed these days.
MORE TO COME.
That’s the way it works. These techniques are used to muddy the waters. The brother thing was really nice about race and was away to keep the racists engaged during the Obama years.
This deep state stuff is a way to have an absurd discredit of the Trump campaign’s investigation.
When it’s all said and done it will have achieved its goal of undermining a legitimate investigation without any accountability for the misinformation that was pushed on the American people.
You mean more Russian disinformation to come, don’t you?
Techniques like what? Posting a Wall Street Journal article as I did?
Yeh, that's hard core birther stuff right there.
You didn’t post an article, it was an opinion piece. Second, it was from Fox News, not WSJ.
No. You are simply keeping things dishonest as usual.
For other viewers, you can see my original post where I explained that the source was Kimberly Strassel, a reporter with the Wall Street Journal, and that I was merely linking to a fox link which contained her original source. I also properly anticipated that forum tards would try to make her article go away because it was contained in a fox link. And they line right up to do that.
I dont think any viewers need any further examples of tard dishonesty but in the unlikely event that you do, just go back and read my original post- and see just how predictable the tard mind is.
Note further - as I said earlier- that the title of this/my thread just asks a question and has a question mark at the end- inviting further information. Amazing how the tards have gone into overdrive trying to make it all go away, whereas I am more than okay if developing information discredits it or confirms it. THEY DO SEEM TO PROTEST A BIT TOO MUCH. I guess looking into matters such as the dossier and fbi collusion and misconduct which they originally dismissed as tin foil has not worked out that well for them. SORRY BOUT DAT.
For other viewers, you can see my original post where I explained that the source was Kimberly Strassel, a reporter with the Wall Street Journal, and that I was merely linking to a fox link which contained her original source. I also properly anticipated that forum tards would try to make her article go away because it was contained in a fox link. And they line right up to do that.
I dont think any viewers need any further examples of tard dishonesty but in the unlikely event that you do, just go back and read my original post- and see just how predictable the tard mind is.
Note further - as I said earlier- that the title of this/my thread just asks a question and has a question mark at the end- inviting further information. Amazing how the tards have gone into overdrive trying to make it all go away, whereas I am more than okay if developing information discredits it or confirms it. THEY DO SEEM TO PROTEST A BIT TOO MUCH. I guess looking into matters such as the dossier and fbi collusion and misconduct which they originally dismissed as tin foil has not worked out that well for them. SORRY BOUT DAT.