Did the American KGB place a mole in the Trump campaign?

TreeFrogTrader said:
No. You are simply keeping things dishonest as usual.

For other viewers, you can see my original post where I explained that the source was Kimberly Strassel, a reporter with the Wall Street Journal, and that I was merely linking to a fox link which contained her original source. I also properly anticipated that forum tards would try to make her article go away because it was contained in a fox link. And they line right up to do that.

I dont think any viewers need any further examples of tard dishonesty but in the unlikely event that you do, just go back and read my original post- and see just how predictable the tard mind is.

Note further - as I said earlier- that the title of this/my thread just asks a question and has a question mark at the end- inviting further information. Amazing how the tards have gone into overdrive trying to make it all go away, whereas I am more than okay if developing information discredits it or confirms it. THEY DO SEEM TO PROTEST A BIT TOO MUCH. I guess looking into matters such as the dossier and fbi collusion and misconduct which they originally dismissed as tin foil has not worked out that well for them. SORRY BOUT DAT.
More...

It’s all flimsy no matter the question marks or opinion pieces. You anticipated push back because what your peddling is obviously a sham.

Like I said to Tony, whether it’s uranium or moles or a birth certificate all of this stuff is pushed out to muddy the waters. You have an argument without substance to use and when it goes nowhere there is no consequence. THIS IS FAKE NEWS.
 
Tony Stark said:
Most of us aren't interested in these tin foil hat conspiracy theries bullshit when there are real crimes and investigations like those againt Trump,Cohen etc
More...


Howz that tin foil conspiracy theory of mine coming along?

No fbi mole in the campaign of interacting with campaign associates under cover?

Keep dismissing it due to my tin foil nature as long as you can. I imagine it will work for at least another four days or less.

As I said before: "In the Land of the Blind, even the person with just one eye is considered to be insane."

Keep in mind futher, that I never said there was one. I just inquired via posting. refer to the title of this thread. Then there was this sudden attempt to make sure that no one even looked at it. Interesting dat. The mind of the tards mirrors that of the FBI investigation of Hillary. Just identify all the places they would not look, especially for the emails, and that pretty much tells you what you want to know and where you should look.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/identity-of-fbi-informant-leaked-to-media
 
S

Cambridge professor outed as FBI informant inside Trump campaign
By Mary Kay Linge

May 19, 2018 | 7:23pm

cambridge-professor-stefan-halper-ties-to-feds1.jpg

A Cambridge professor with deep ties to American and British intelligence has been outed as an agent who snooped on the Trump presidential campaign for the FBI.

Multiple media outlets have named Stefan Halper, 73, as the secret informant who met with Trump campaign advisers Carter Page and George Papadopoulos starting in the summer of 2016. The American-born academic previously served in the Nixon, Ford and Reagan administrations.



SEE ALSO

Trump accuses feds of planting ‘spy’ in his campaign
The revelation, stemming from recent reports in which FBI sources admitted sending an agent to snoop on the Trump camp, heightens suspicions that the FBI was seeking to entrap Trump campaign aides. Papodopoulous has pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, while Page was the subject of a federal surveillance warrant.

“If the FBI or DOJ was infiltrating a campaign for the benefit of another campaign, that is a really big deal,” President Trump tweeted Saturday, calling for the FBI to release additional documents to Congress.

The Halper revelation also shows the Obama administration’s FBI began prying into the opposing party’s presidential nominee earlier than it previously admitted.

Halper’s sit-downs with Page reportedly started in early July 2016, undermining fired FBI Director James Comey’s previous claim that the bureau’s investigation into the Trump campaign began at the end of that month.

Halper made his first overture when he met with Page at a British symposium. The two remained in regular contact for more than a year, meeting at Halper’s Virginia farm and in Washington, DC, as well as exchanging emails.


The professor met with Trump campaign co-chair Sam Clovis in late August, offering his services as a foreign-policy adviser, The Washington Post reported Friday, without naming the academic.

Clovis did not see the conversation as suspicious, his attorney told the paper — but is now “unsettled” that “the professor” never mentioned he’d struck up a relationship with Page.

Days later, Halper contacted Papadopoulos by e-mail. The professor offered the young and inexperienced campaign aide $3,000 and an all-expenses-paid trip to London, ostensibly to write a paper about energy in the eastern Mediterranean region.

“George, you know about hacking the e-mails from Russia, right?” the professor pressed Papadopoulos when they met, according to reports — a reference to Trump’s campaign-trail riffs about Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail server.


Sources close to Papadopoulos told NBC Newsthat he now believes Halper was working for an intelligence agency.

Highly detailed descriptions of the FBI informant in Friday reports in The New York Times and Washington Post pegged Halper in all but name. Outlets including NBC and Fox News subsequently connected the dots. The revelation confirms a March report in the Daily Caller that outlined Halper’s repeated meetings with Papadopoulos and Page.

It is not clear if the professor was paid to speak with Trump campaign figures, but public records show that he has received large payments from the federal government in the last two years.

The Department of Defense’s Office of Net Assessment — a shadowy think tank that reports directly to the secretary of defense — paid Halper $282,000 in 2016 and $129,000 in 2017.


Halper has close personal and professional ties to the CIA reaching back decades. He is the son-in-law of a former deputy director of the agency and worked on the 1980 presidential campaign of George H.W. Bush, who had served as CIA director.

When Bush became Ronald Reagan’s running mate, Halper was implicated in a spying scandal in which CIA officials gave inside information on the Carter administration to the GOP campaign.

Meanwhile, reports emerged Saturday that Donald Trump Jr. met in August 2016 with a representative of Saudi crown princes, who offered pre-election help to his father’s campaign.

An Israeli political strategist who attended the meeting told the New York Times that their plan to carry out a pro-Trump social media campaign did not go forward.
 
Trump had multiple crimnals and people with ties to Russia in his campaign but think its a conspiracy because law enforcement may have had agents there:confused:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top