Did the American KGB place a mole in the Trump campaign?

I know you have a particular sense of humor. If it was Trump's administration using the FBI to infiltrate the Dems campaign in 2020, I am sure you will be laughing your ass too..
If the 2020 dem candidate's campaign is full of criminals like trumps was the fbi should have agents inside the campaign
 
If the 2020 dem candidate's campaign is full of criminals like trumps was the fbi should have agents inside the campaign
Yup, that is why so many people are in jail. But wait, there might be a few that do actually go to jail. As FTT has stated, much to come! Stay tuned!

As for the DNC being full of criminals, I agree.
 
Let's just put this in the MORE TO COME category for sure.

It is related to the dossier story too. We dont know the full dossier story. We just know that whatever the full story is, it is worse than what we know. That is why the DOJ/FBI works overtime to cover it up.

The evolving story- if true and I dont know without seeing some more reporting on this- is that when the FBI asserts that they did not rely on the dossier for the FISA warrant (overlooking McCabes testimony that they did) because they allegedly had other sources that the other source was a FBI mole placed in the Trump Campaign. Yeh, as I said, the real story will turn out to be worse than the speculation. They are working very, very hard on the coverup.

Yup, and I just did a quick search to give an article to look at for those who dont know what I am talking about, and a Fox article came up. So there ya go tards, there's your chance to dismiss it. Good luck wit dat. They are reporting on Kimberly Strassels report in the Wall Street Journal- but then again the WSJ is also owned by Rupert Murdoch, so that can buy you another 48 hours. Put bondo and duct tape on your denial as long as you need, but the story is going to spread to other media sources even if to help you deny it.

More to come.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018...bi-place-mole-inside-2016-trump-campaign.html
It is clear that certain advisors to the Trump Campaign were under investigation by the FBI well before Simpson and Steele made the Steele report available to the FBI. But lets suppose instead that the entire FBI investigation was started because of the Steele report. We know the Steele report was funded initially by a fat cat republican and the funding was picked later by the DNC. That should cast a doubt on the report as to whether it is biased and true. Let's suppose that some of the findings in the Steele report were found to be correct and backed up by further investigation. Would the fact that the DNC funded a part of that report make those findings wrong? Would it make independent verification by the FBI inadmissible in court?

It's already established that there were no "moles" imbedded in the campaign as Trump claimed.
The informants were people that the FBI used on isolated occasions to try and get further information from Stone and Page outside of and apart the campaign. There is no evidence at this point of any FBI informants being "embedded" in the campaign.

You're beating a dead horse. Why not move on to something interesting and productive? Fox News has viewership and advertising revenue concerns; you don't. We can understand why they continue to beat a dead horse, but you don't have to join them in acting the fool.
 
Last edited:
We know the Steele report was funded initially by a fat cat republican and the funding was picked later by the DNC. That should cast a doubt on the report as to whether it is biased and true.

Alright. Let's stop right here and examine this. I won't be reading the rest your post beyond this since it is a non-starter.

You are trying to with the repetitive lefty tripe that attempts to spin the idea that republicans started this whole dossier thing so therefore they have no bitching rights about where it ended out.

NEGATORY.

It is true that the republicans or one of them - I can't remember which- hired FUSION-GPS to do oppo research on trump but then that ended as the person who sponsored it was beaten in the primary or whatever- anyway that effort ended. There was no Steele there to do a "Steele report" at that time. Yes, Glen Simpson the owner of Fusion/GPS was there. And when Hillary wanted to pick up on the Trump oppo research that Fusion had previously been doing Hillary became a client of Fusion- that would have been late Spring of 2016. Glen Simpson then hired a spy friend/associate who had contacts in the UK and Russia to work on Hillary's oppo research and some russian/uk angles. In no way, was Steele there or working on any early phases of any "dossier" during the time when Fusion was being paid by republicans. So stop spinning that tripe.

To compound matters, the FBI offered to pay Fusion/Steele to do even more oppo work so that they could use it against Trump. Nothing like having the state goons helping to fund oppo research or - the other way round-having political opponents provide the basis for a fisa warrant and then it is no verified.

If you want to get persnickity, I am aware that the fbi technically never paid steele, and the libs like to say that. The truth is that the fbi authorized a payment, and then even cut a check, but it was withheld and not issued when Buzzfeed broke the dossier story and they tried to duck. Not pretty.
 
Back
Top