Me too.Its quite funny lol
Me too.Its quite funny lol
I know you have a particular sense of humor. If it was Trump's administration using the FBI to infiltrate the Dems campaign in 2020, I am sure you will be laughing your ass too..Me too.Its quite funny lol
If the 2020 dem candidate's campaign is full of criminals like trumps was the fbi should have agents inside the campaignI know you have a particular sense of humor. If it was Trump's administration using the FBI to infiltrate the Dems campaign in 2020, I am sure you will be laughing your ass too..
Btw, will have the same outcome as his wires tapped investigation but yall keep hoping
Yup, that is why so many people are in jail. But wait, there might be a few that do actually go to jail. As FTT has stated, much to come! Stay tuned!If the 2020 dem candidate's campaign is full of criminals like trumps was the fbi should have agents inside the campaign
3 have pleaded guilty and manafort will certainly be found guilty and mueller isn't done yet.Yup, that is why so many people are in jail. But wait, there might be a few that do actually go to jail.
I just hope Mueller stays out of jail himself.3 have pleaded guilty and manafort will certainly be found guilty and mueller isn't done yet.
No need to worry about thatI just hope Mueller stays out of jail himself.

It is clear that certain advisors to the Trump Campaign were under investigation by the FBI well before Simpson and Steele made the Steele report available to the FBI. But lets suppose instead that the entire FBI investigation was started because of the Steele report. We know the Steele report was funded initially by a fat cat republican and the funding was picked later by the DNC. That should cast a doubt on the report as to whether it is biased and true. Let's suppose that some of the findings in the Steele report were found to be correct and backed up by further investigation. Would the fact that the DNC funded a part of that report make those findings wrong? Would it make independent verification by the FBI inadmissible in court?Let's just put this in the MORE TO COME category for sure.
It is related to the dossier story too. We dont know the full dossier story. We just know that whatever the full story is, it is worse than what we know. That is why the DOJ/FBI works overtime to cover it up.
The evolving story- if true and I dont know without seeing some more reporting on this- is that when the FBI asserts that they did not rely on the dossier for the FISA warrant (overlooking McCabes testimony that they did) because they allegedly had other sources that the other source was a FBI mole placed in the Trump Campaign. Yeh, as I said, the real story will turn out to be worse than the speculation. They are working very, very hard on the coverup.
Yup, and I just did a quick search to give an article to look at for those who dont know what I am talking about, and a Fox article came up. So there ya go tards, there's your chance to dismiss it. Good luck wit dat. They are reporting on Kimberly Strassels report in the Wall Street Journal- but then again the WSJ is also owned by Rupert Murdoch, so that can buy you another 48 hours. Put bondo and duct tape on your denial as long as you need, but the story is going to spread to other media sources even if to help you deny it.
More to come.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018...bi-place-mole-inside-2016-trump-campaign.html
We know the Steele report was funded initially by a fat cat republican and the funding was picked later by the DNC. That should cast a doubt on the report as to whether it is biased and true.