Let's just put this in the MORE TO COME category for sure.
It is related to the dossier story too. We dont know the full dossier story. We just know that whatever the full story is, it is worse than what we know. That is why the DOJ/FBI works overtime to cover it up.
The evolving story- if true and I dont know without seeing some more reporting on this- is that when the FBI asserts that they did not rely on the dossier for the FISA warrant (overlooking McCabes testimony that they did) because they allegedly had other sources that the other source was a FBI mole placed in the Trump Campaign. Yeh, as I said, the real story will turn out to be worse than the speculation. They are working very, very hard on the coverup.
Yup, and I just did a quick search to give an article to look at for those who dont know what I am talking about, and a Fox article came up. So there ya go tards, there's your chance to dismiss it. Good luck wit dat. They are reporting on Kimberly Strassels report in the Wall Street Journal- but then again the WSJ is also owned by Rupert Murdoch, so that can buy you another 48 hours. Put bondo and duct tape on your denial as long as you need, but the story is going to spread to other media sources even if to help you deny it.
More to come.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018...bi-place-mole-inside-2016-trump-campaign.html
It is related to the dossier story too. We dont know the full dossier story. We just know that whatever the full story is, it is worse than what we know. That is why the DOJ/FBI works overtime to cover it up.
The evolving story- if true and I dont know without seeing some more reporting on this- is that when the FBI asserts that they did not rely on the dossier for the FISA warrant (overlooking McCabes testimony that they did) because they allegedly had other sources that the other source was a FBI mole placed in the Trump Campaign. Yeh, as I said, the real story will turn out to be worse than the speculation. They are working very, very hard on the coverup.
Yup, and I just did a quick search to give an article to look at for those who dont know what I am talking about, and a Fox article came up. So there ya go tards, there's your chance to dismiss it. Good luck wit dat. They are reporting on Kimberly Strassels report in the Wall Street Journal- but then again the WSJ is also owned by Rupert Murdoch, so that can buy you another 48 hours. Put bondo and duct tape on your denial as long as you need, but the story is going to spread to other media sources even if to help you deny it.
More to come.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018...bi-place-mole-inside-2016-trump-campaign.html
