Coin Kaepernick Convinces Nike To Pull Flag-Themed Shoe

giphy.gif

Don't argue with stupid, you cannot win.
 
It is not about patriotism it is about selected outrage. the Betsy Ross flag is flown regularly at U.S. events and is a symbol of the first 13 colonies of the U.S. and the Revolutionary War (hence the appearance often on July 4th.). For many years not any real public outcry that the flag refers to time that there were also slaves. In fact at the time of that Flag, only wealthy white males were really allowed to vote and women had no rights.

So Nike puts it on their shoe and as ugly as I think it looks, now there is collected outrage from Cap and twatters.

So....suddenly it is bad? Cap is getting paid by Nike, he works for them and haqs not global brnad staying power like Tiger Woods does. Tiger makes Nike hundreds of millions in golf gear so I understand why they did not drop him. But if Cap was all over the front page for cheating on his wife repeatedly in a scandal he would be dropped tomorrow.

I honestly don't see the racist angle on this one. I just see it triggering cons and that's good enough for me.
 
I honestly don't see the racist angle on this one. I just see it triggering cons and that's good enough for me.

Well to be fair Kap got triggered first, cons getting triggered is just fun because they apparently claimed to enver buy Nike again so not sure why they are standing up for the shoe haha.
 
Well to be fair Kap got triggered first, cons getting triggered is just fun because they apparently claimed to enver buy Nike again so not sure why they are standing up for the shoe haha.
Maybe Kap is trolling at this point? "Yo, let's mess withy these white Bois see if they ask how high? When I say jump"
 
You went from sneakers to white nationalist debunked pseudo science. Besides, your argument falls apart when you see all the white MAGA "high iq" brainwashed cultists.


White nationalist debunked pseudo science.

What does the term "white" nationalist mean?

A simplistic approach to establishing a meaning for "white" nationalist would be that it means people prefer their own kind. Is there something wrong with that?

The conventional interpretation is that "white" individuals on average are more adept then some other group at some skill. The skill is broadly interpreted to refer to "intelligence."

This is a valid proposition. It is incumbent on the other group to demonstrate that with respect to the skill in question, here proxied by intelligence, that they are superior, or equal, or in fact inferior in said skill. That a group would be sensitive to this scrutiny already suggestion an answer.

The "pseudo science" is usually alluding to The Bell Curve - Murray and Hernstein. It is an extensive 845 page statistical analysis of differences between "races". Few people have actually read it in its entirety. Is it without mistakes - no. But in the large I find the conclusions more true than false. The conclusion was that there are statistically significant differences between the groups of be examined in the study.

The Bell Curve firmly establishes that there is a difference between groups but does not offer an explanation as to why.

The why is found by invoking the Out of Africa Hypothesis. Some groups stayed in Africa but some groups left Africa. The groups that left Africa via random mutation and natural selection acquired different skills to assist them in surviving in harsher environments. Examples might be deferring immediate gratification or developing long range planning skills.

There is a genetic bases for differences in group performance.

You can play around with words like what is intelligence or find one little thing wrong with this or that but the evidence in the whole is overwhelming. There is a significant difference in group performance, in The Bell Curve, it was 1 standard deviation from the mean, between groups. This difference in large part is genetic in origin. The genetic difference was brought about by 10,000's of years in difference environments.
 
Whaaaaat?
Tony..... I think you just busted yourself out bro.
That statement... pretty much seals the deal on the supposition that so many here have always put forth... that you are posting from some basement somewhere in Siberia (or the like).

No one that lives in N. America, Europe, or any Western nation for that matter could have written that. Unless you're some kind of off the f'n wall hermit recluse.

Now the #1 brand in walk, work, dress casuals and casual lifestyle footwear in the United States,* Skechers has grown from its roots as a utility boot company in 1992 to a globally recognized, award-winning, multi-billion dollar footwear brand known for comfort, quality, innovation and style. Through its history, athletes, singers and actors have all appeared in the brand’s footwear campaigns—from Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Matt Dillon, and Robert Downey Jr. in the Company’s early years, to newer ambassadors like Camila Cabello, Brooke Burke, Sugar Ray Leonard and Tony Romo, who appeared in a Skechers Super Bowl spot earlier this year—along with athletes landing on the podium including elite runner Meb Keflezighi, and elite golfers Matt Kuchar and Brooke Henderson. Recent brand milestones include the global resurgence of the Company’s heritage Skechers D’Lites collection, the 3000th retail store opening in China, and awards for its GO RUN product, from Runner’s World’s Editors’ Choice award to Outside magazine’s “Gear of the Year” honor.

Based in Manhattan Beach, California, Skechers designs, develops and markets a diverse range of lifestyle footwear for men, women and children, as well as performance footwear for men and women. Skechers footwear is available in the United States and over 170 countries and territories worldwide via department and specialty stores, more than 3,060 Skechers Company-owned and third-party-owned retail stores, and the Company’s e-commerce websites.



giphy.webp
 
White nationalist debunked pseudo science.

What does the term "white" nationalist mean?

A simplistic approach to establishing a meaning for "white" nationalist would be that it means people prefer their own kind. Is there something wrong with that?

The conventional interpretation is that "white" individuals on average are more adept then some other group at some skill. The skill is broadly interpreted to refer to "intelligence."

This is a valid proposition. It is incumbent on the other group to demonstrate that with respect to the skill in question, here proxied by intelligence, that they are superior, or equal, or in fact inferior in said skill. That a group would be sensitive to this scrutiny already suggestion an answer.

The "pseudo science" is usually alluding to The Bell Curve - Murray and Hernstein. It is an extensive 845 page statistical analysis of differences between "races". Few people have actually read it in its entirety. Is it without mistakes - no. But in the large I find the conclusions more true than false. The conclusion was that there are statistically significant differences between the groups of be examined in the study.

The Bell Curve firmly establishes that there is a difference between groups but does not offer an explanation as to why.

The why is found by invoking the Out of Africa Hypothesis. Some groups stayed in Africa but some groups left Africa. The groups that left Africa via random mutation and natural selection acquired different skills to assist them in surviving in harsher environments. Examples might be deferring immediate gratification or developing long range planning skills.

There is a genetic bases for differences in group performance.

You can play around with words like what is intelligence or find one little thing wrong with this or that but the evidence in the whole is overwhelming. There is a significant difference in group performance, in The Bell Curve, it was 1 standard deviation from the mean, between groups. This difference in large part is genetic in origin. The genetic difference was brought about by 10,000's of years in difference environments.
Shut up Jem!
 
Back
Top