Climate change is on ice

[futurecurrents]

Quote from jem:

this is peer reviewed. you are spouting unsupported garbage fc.

Really? Gee, who should we believe? A whore meteorologist like Watts? Or NASA?

Your such a good loyal fanatical sheep co-liar.

This what NASA says


Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus


A sane person would believe NASA over a whore TV weatherman.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from futurecurrents:

Really? Gee, who should we believe? A whore meteorologist like Watts?...

...or an AC installer who had "experimental" sex with his gay brother while growing up?

 

[denner]

Quote from Lucrum:

...or an AC installer who had "experimental" sex with his gay brother while growing up?

+1,000

 

[gwb-trading]

Let's plot the British Met Office CRUTEM3 global temperature data set - shocking no global temperature increase since 1996.

Want to plot your own graphs based on the CRUTEM3 or CRUTEM4 global temperature data sets or do a comparison - here is the graphing url
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/cr...ast:360/trend/plot/crutem3vgl/last:360/trend/

What to download the British Met CRUTEM3 or CRUTEM4 raw data and associated information to plot your own analysis - here is the url
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/

Unlike FC some of us have actually downloaded, plotted, and evaluated the raw data from the British Met, NOAA, East Anglia, and other sources. Sadly for the global climate change promoters - the actual data demonstrates a complete lack of man-made warming.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from gwb-trading:

Let's plot the British Met Office CRUTEM3 global temperature data set - shocking no global temperature increase since 1996.

Want to plot your own graphs based on the CRUTEM3 or CRUTEM4 global temperature data sets or do a comparison - here is the graphing url
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/cr...ast:360/trend/plot/crutem3vgl/last:360/trend/

What to download the British Met CRUTEM3 or CRUTEM4 raw data and associated information to plot your own analysis - here is the url
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/

Unlike FC some of us have actually downloaded, plotted, and evaluated the raw data from the British Met, NOAA, East Anglia, and other sources. Sadly for the global climate change promoters - the actual data demonstrates a complete lack of man-made warming.

Wow, the immediate chart visible on following your first link shows an explosion of high temp. anomalies far in excess of cold temp. anomalies. Damn, look at the ocean surface anomaly chart, big increase in high temp. anomalies since the last pause.

Thanks for the data!

 

[gwb-trading]

Quote from Ricter:

Wow, the immediate chart visible on following your first link shows an explosion of high temp. anomalies far in excess of cold temp. anomalies. Damn, look at the ocean surface anomaly chart, big increase in high temp. anomalies since the last pause.

Thanks for the data!

Yes, the displayed chart shows the natural warming of the earth since 1850 or so. Note that the default chart also clearly demonstrates that there is no warming since 1996.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from gwb-trading:

Yes, the displayed chart shows the natural warming of the earth since 1850 or so. Note that the default chart also clearly demonstrates that there is no warming since 1996.

Compared to previous pauses/reversals it is tiny. It is very much too early to be saying "global warming is a hoax".

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Ricter:

Compared to previous pauses/reversals it is tiny.

Not unlike your intellectual honesty eh rectum?

It is very much too early to be saying "global warming is a hoax".

And yet scientists all over the world ARE saying it.

 

[gwb-trading]

Quote from Ricter:

Compared to previous pauses/reversals it is tiny. It is very much too early to be saying "global warming is a hoax".

Why don't we increase the time period to increase the last 15,000 years or so. Maybe include the medieval warm period around 1000AD when it was warmer than today.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from gwb-trading:

Why don't we increase the time period to increase the last 15,000 years or so. Maybe include the medieval warm period around 1000AD when it was warmer than today.

Why don't we include the last time CO2 levels rose so rapidly? Oh, right, there has been no such time.