They took in millions from a guy who wasn't even the shareholder of Uranium One for THREE years - so how the hell is that relevant? NYT story doesn't say what you are saying, here is another fact check on it
"April 2015 New York Times story. But the story doesn’t say that. And the idea that Clinton could have “handed over” uranium rights, even if she wanted to, isn’t supported by the facts."
http://www.factcheck.org/2016/10/a-false-corruption-claim/
All of this needs to be reviewed in detail as part of a special investigtion of hillary and the crime foundation. We can agree on that, and indeed, we are working our way toward that as trump goes on the offensive.