I see. So the NRC did not approve the transfer so that let's Hillary and company off the hook for their approval at the State Department. Might want to work on that theory a little. Did Bubba give back all the bucks he received to grease the deal. Didn't think so. Over three million. Minimum.
Chaffetz calls for $2,500 legislator housing stipend
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
9 Federal agencies and The State of Utah had to approve the deal,and The President still had the final say.
All those agencies had to approve the deal with Obama having the final say but according to jem Hillary sold our uranium to Russia.This is even worse than his birther beliefs.
- Department of the Treasury (chair)
- Department of Justice
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Defense
- Department of State
- Department of Energy
- Office of the U.S. Trade Representative
- Office of Science & Technology Policy
- The state of Utah nuclear regulator
All those agencies had to approve the deal with Obama having the final say but according to jem Hillary sold our uranium to Russia.This is even worse than his birther beliefs.
Last edited:
compare your fact check and snopes b.s. and propsepective NRCmemo... with the New York Times reporting of the reality Uranium left the country. (and I note here on ET in the past there other reports which tracked the uranium leaving the country. )
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
Asked about that, the commission confirmed that Uranium One has, in fact, shipped yellowcake to Canada even though it does not have an export license. Instead, the transport company doing the shipping, RSB Logistic Services, has the license. A commission spokesman said that “to the best of our knowledge” most of the uranium sent to Canada for processing was returned for use in the United States. A Uranium One spokeswoman, Donna Wichers, said 25 percent had gone to Western Europe and Japan. At the moment, with the uranium market in a downturn, nothing is being shipped from the Wyoming mines.
The “no export” assurance given at the time of the Rosatom deal is not the only one that turned out to be less than it seemed. Despite pledges to the contrary, Uranium One was delisted from the Toronto Stock Exchange and taken private. As of 2013, Rosatom’s subsidiary, ARMZ, owned 100 percent of it.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
Asked about that, the commission confirmed that Uranium One has, in fact, shipped yellowcake to Canada even though it does not have an export license. Instead, the transport company doing the shipping, RSB Logistic Services, has the license. A commission spokesman said that “to the best of our knowledge” most of the uranium sent to Canada for processing was returned for use in the United States. A Uranium One spokeswoman, Donna Wichers, said 25 percent had gone to Western Europe and Japan. At the moment, with the uranium market in a downturn, nothing is being shipped from the Wyoming mines.
The “no export” assurance given at the time of the Rosatom deal is not the only one that turned out to be less than it seemed. Despite pledges to the contrary, Uranium One was delisted from the Toronto Stock Exchange and taken private. As of 2013, Rosatom’s subsidiary, ARMZ, owned 100 percent of it.
Why would Hillary be on the hook for an approval the entire government agreed on?
Your first claim is a lie
http://www.standard.net/National/20...Haiti-factory-amounted-to-a-massive-sweatshop
Your second claim is another lie
http://www.factcheck.org/2017/02/factchecking-trumps-news-conference/
No wonder, you guys have no problems with Donald 'BIGGEST INAUGRATION CROWD' Dump as your leader
factcheck and snopes are very biased sources.
no one takes them seriously anymore unless they cut against the leftist argument.
no one takes them seriously anymore unless they cut against the leftist argument.
the point is did the clinton foundation take in millions or not. read the new york times article.
They took in millions from a guy who wasn't even the shareholder of Uranium One for THREE years - so how the hell is that relevant? NYT story doesn't say what you are saying, here is another fact check on it
"April 2015 New York Times story. But the story doesn’t say that. And the idea that Clinton could have “handed over” uranium rights, even if she wanted to, isn’t supported by the facts."
http://www.factcheck.org/2016/10/a-false-corruption-claim/
Sorry but you have crabwalked sideways.
The issue of the clintons- including Bubba's brother- profiteering from the haitian relief funds is well documented. You cite some claim about a factory that may or may not have been debunked as a way to make it all go away. Try a little harder. Reality does not go away that easily.
Next, I guess you are questioning whether hillary was fronting a pay-to-play operation in the state department that was linked to the Clinton Crime Foundation. Not going to replay that whole issue, since it apparently is new to you. But since you are apparently in a research mode, why dont you google around and tell me how the clinton foundation donations- and the amount that bubba was getting for a speech- suddenly plummeted after the electon. Hint, I already know the right answer.