Chaffetz calls for $2,500 legislator housing stipend

its not a lie just because you found a prospective govt memo saying no uranium will leave the country.

why the hell else would russia be buying the company and people connected with the deal paying millions to the clinton foundation. you think they like their speeches.


https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

The headline on the website Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when its precursor served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”

The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

...
Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.





Tony Stark said:
Repeating this lie yet again I see :rolleyes:
More...
 
Last edited:
more... talk about russian connections...

Amid this influx of Uranium One-connected money, Mr. Clinton was invited to speak in Moscow in June 2010, the same month Rosatom struck its deal for a majority stake in Uranium One.

The $500,000 fee — among Mr. Clinton’s highest — was paid by Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin that has invited world leaders, including Tony Blair, the former British prime minister, to speak at its investor conferences.

Renaissance Capital analysts talked up Uranium One’s stock, assigning it a “buy” rating and saying in a July 2010 research report that it was “the best play” in the uranium markets. In addition, Renaissance Capital turned up that same year as a major donor, along with Mr. Giustra and several companies linked to Uranium One or UrAsia, to a small medical charity in Colorado run by a friend of Mr. Giustra’s. In a newsletter to supporters, the friend credited Mr. Giustra with helping get donations from “businesses around the world.”

...

A person with knowledge of the Clinton Foundation’s fund-raising operation, who requested anonymity to speak candidly about it, said that for many people, the hope is that money will in fact buy influence: “Why do you think they are doing it — because they love them?” But whether it actually does is another question. And in this case, there were broader geopolitical pressures that likely came into play as the United States considered whether to approve the Rosatom-Uranium One deal.
 
jem said:
why the hell else would russia be buying the company and people connected with the deal paying millions to the clinton foundation. you think they like their speeches.
More...


Russia bought the company for Uranium One’s uranium in Kazakhstan

The guy who gave most of the money to the Clinton foundation sold his stake in the company before the russia deal.
 
your snopes and leftist bullshit fact check .org crap is crap... we have no idea if the uranium left the country but I note that a bunch of yellowcake wound up in Iran with obama's blessing.


https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html


Asked about that, the commission confirmed that Uranium One has, in fact, shipped yellowcake to Canada even though it does not have an export license. Instead, the transport company doing the shipping, RSB Logistic Services, has the license. A commission spokesman said that “to the best of our knowledge” most of the uranium sent to Canada for processing was returned for use in the United States. A Uranium One spokeswoman, Donna Wichers, said 25 percent had gone to Western Europe and Japan. At the moment, with the uranium market in a downturn, nothing is being shipped from the Wyoming mines.

The “no export” assurance given at the time of the Rosatom deal is not the only one that turned out to be less than it seemed. Despite pledges to the contrary, Uranium One was delisted from the Toronto Stock Exchange and taken private. As of 2013, Rosatom’s subsidiary, ARMZ, owned 100 percent of it.
 
read that very long new york times article you will see democrat scum selling out the country for donations to the clinton fund. they are dirty scum.
 
jem said:
the hope is that money will in fact buy influence: “Why do you think they are doing it
More...


Hillary had very little influence though.


http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

The Uranium One deal was not Clinton’s to veto or approve

Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating the transaction for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the Uranium One decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton herself “never intervened” in committee matters.
 
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

upload_2017-6-27_18-12-1.jpeg








http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/16/trump-claims--falsely--that-clinton-gave-russia-20-of-us-uranium.html


upload_2017-6-27_18-15-2.jpeg







http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin...r-claim-donald-trump-says-hillary-clinton-ga/

upload_2017-6-27_18-16-4.jpeg










http://www.factcheck.org/2017/02/factchecking-trumps-news-conference/



Trump wrongly said that Hillary Clinton “gave” Russia 20 percent of the uranium in the United States. Clinton was one of nine votes approving the deal. She alone couldn’t have stopped the deal, which involved 20 percent of U.S. production capacity, not stocks, and the uranium can’t go to Russia without export licenses.
 
exGOPer said:
At least Clinton's made money by yapping to rich people, so it's better you stop bringing Clintons into all this.
More...

Hardly.

No one profited more from the disaster relief programs for the most vulnerable of the vulnerable in Haiti than the Clintons. Of course it is true that they milked the rich too because the public sector and the Clinton Crime Foundation are just one big gravy train. It's always helps when you have the State Department as your marketing office.

I am not going to replay that uranium discussion. Suffice it to say that even the New York Times vomits in trying to explain it. Too bad they did not just read Snopes first to find out the "right" answer.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top