So what's the Bottom Line to all this technical talk and debating,
What kind of % returns over what time frame does all this deliver to the wise trader?
Can I be short a long put? Can I be short a short call? You do know I am just messing with the nomenclature, right? I was just nickpicking?

Yes. I was just joining the party.![]()
You are just saying the same what I already had said in my previous posting:Dipsht, the calendar is best practice if vols rise. The vertical is preferred if vols fall.
And you are imprecise since you talk of IV generally, not distinguishing btw. the IV of the Short and Long leg.And: a higher LongPut IV instead then gives a higher PnL%. So what?
Just do the math to get the answer, as it's dependent on the basis (ie. the vertical alternative to the calendar alternative, or vice-versa). The degree of the improvement depends also on whether it's a margin acct or a cash acct. I think margin acct is generally better.So what's the Bottom Line to all this technical talk and debating,
What kind of % returns over what time frame does all this deliver to the wise trader?
You are just saying the same what I already had said in my previous posting:
And you are imprecise since you talk of IV generally, not distinguishing btw. the IV of the Short and Long leg.
Even if you were implicitly meaning the combined "net volatility", it still would not be correct, IMO.
Another fallacy of yours: your above 2nd statement says that at expiration IV matters with verticals.
But it does not! B/c IV of any option does not matter at its expiration, as then only the price of the underlying matters.
Tell us more such BS! Idiot! Back to my ban file.Vols are expiration are zero with verticals. The vert is preferred if vols fall bc the calendar will suffer by comparison, moron.
Just do the math to get the answer, as it's dependent on the basis (ie. the vertical alternative to the calendar alternative, or vice-versa). The degree of the improvement depends also on whether it's a margin acct or a cash acct.