It was a different time you see....
That's sarcasm @ the hipocracy of how this would be spun BTW
Breitbart would rather defend alleged child molester Roy Moore than lose an election
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
It was a different time you see....
That's sarcasm @ the hipocracy of how this would be spun BTW
The White Race, aka the racist, nazi, pedophiles, only care about is that damn wall. Remember these people are for "family values."
Last edited:
There is corroboration of the WaPo report, NE simply makes stuff up just like Trump.
And nice Whataboutism as well, what did JFK do as worse as molesting 14 year olds targeting kids from single homes?
You cons have a hard time differentiating consensual sex between adults and 'exploits', and yet you choose to support a pedo rapist like Trump
Sure, the Russian stooge barely squeaked by after help from Comey and 200 million spent by his Kremlin buddies, Dems won't be complacent again as they were in 16 when they thought voting was a formality.
Lots of Alabamians Are More Likely to Vote for Moore Following Allegations
https://splinternews.com/lots-of-alabamians-are-more-likely-to-vote-for-moore-fo-1820376884
A new poll of registered voters in Alabama’s Senate race found that 29% of those surveyed are more likely to vote for Republican Roy Moore following allegations of sexual misconduct against four underage women.
The poll was conducted by JMC Analytics and Polling from Nov. 9-11. It has a margin of error of 4.1%.
One of the questions asked: “Given the allegations that have come out about Roy Moore’s alleged sexual misconduct against four underage women, are you more or less likely to support him as a result of these allegations?”
In contrast to the nearly third of respondents who said they are more likely to vote for Moore, who has so far refused to drop out of the key Senate race,
(More at above url)
https://splinternews.com/lots-of-alabamians-are-more-likely-to-vote-for-moore-fo-1820376884
A new poll of registered voters in Alabama’s Senate race found that 29% of those surveyed are more likely to vote for Republican Roy Moore following allegations of sexual misconduct against four underage women.
The poll was conducted by JMC Analytics and Polling from Nov. 9-11. It has a margin of error of 4.1%.
One of the questions asked: “Given the allegations that have come out about Roy Moore’s alleged sexual misconduct against four underage women, are you more or less likely to support him as a result of these allegations?”
In contrast to the nearly third of respondents who said they are more likely to vote for Moore, who has so far refused to drop out of the key Senate race,
(More at above url)
the idiot left and their drones keep wishing to believe the opposition voter is dumb. The reality is more voters than ever are aware of how crooked the establishment is and the vote is an informed voted against the establishment.
Its almost like the media and the drones are fooled by their own propaganda again... Just like the polls which had hillary up by a landslide a few weeks before the vote. They were all kept in their safe space of ignorance.
Its like the media and these drones suffer from sort of mass denial pyschosis and their drones suffer a mass dunning kruger effect.
(this is not really a comment limited to the Roy Moore situation. That could could change if facts come out supporting the victims allegations. what I am saying is the media and the left have not yet realized they cause the other side to get more votes. )
Its almost like the media and the drones are fooled by their own propaganda again... Just like the polls which had hillary up by a landslide a few weeks before the vote. They were all kept in their safe space of ignorance.
Its like the media and these drones suffer from sort of mass denial pyschosis and their drones suffer a mass dunning kruger effect.
(this is not really a comment limited to the Roy Moore situation. That could could change if facts come out supporting the victims allegations. what I am saying is the media and the left have not yet realized they cause the other side to get more votes. )
Last edited:
Let's get back to how far the Washington Post has fallen -- it is now primarily into smut and smear journalism. The paper in the old days had standards and some level of integrity in its reporting.
The first sexual liaison story the Washington Post reported in detail was about presidential candidate John Edwards. The Washington Post did not break the story or hire investigators/reporters to dig up dirt in the Edwards story, it merely provided summaries of the details that came out via other outlets, witnesses and court/party filings.
This is very different than the Washington Post today, which sent investigators & reporters to Alabama to deliberately dig up decades old smut on a Senate candidate. This is not different than how the National Enquirer operates. The journalistic standards and integrity at the Washington Post have tumbled greatly as the staff at the paper focuses on lurid reporting regarding sexual escapades & behavior of candidates and for the most part ignores serious in-depth political reporting.
They didn't send investigators to Alabama to 'dig up' anything, these stories have been well known in Alabama and when reporters pertaining to election showed up, they heard them and then pursued them.
There is more and more confirmation everyday, the only reason you suddenly care about 'integrity' is because it makes your side look bad.