Breitbart would rather defend alleged child molester Roy Moore than lose an election

[gwb-trading]

They didn't send investigators to Alabama to 'dig up' anything, these stories have been well known in Alabama and when reporters pertaining to election showed up, they heard them and then pursued them.

There is more and more confirmation everyday, the only reason you suddenly care about 'integrity' is because it makes your side look bad.

Just like to he stories regarding regarding John Edwards’ mistress were well known in North Carolina and when reporters from the National Enquirer showed up they heard them and pursued them.

Glad you made it clear that there is no difference between the Washington Post and National Enquirer — both have sunk to the lowest level of tabloid “journalism”.

 

[exGOPer]

Just like to he stories regarding regarding John Edwards’ mistress were well known in North Carolina and when reporters from the National Enquirer showed up they heard them and pursued them.

Glad you made it clear that there is no difference between the Washington Post and National Enquirer — both have sunk to the lowest level of tabloid “journalism”.

You forgot all the thousands of times NE published absolute crap and never retracted any of them, that's why they had zero credibility.

Don't be glad with your false equivalence BS, let's compare the crap NE publishes as opposed to Wapo and let's see who is glad then. NE got one story right out of thousands of fake news and that means they are same as Wapo? Who are you kidding with that BS.

 

[gwb-trading]

You forgot all the thousands of times NE published absolute crap and never retracted any of them, that's why they had zero credibility.

Don't be glad with your false equivalence BS, let's compare the crap NE publishes as opposed to Wapo and let's see who is glad then. NE got one story right out of thousands of fake news and that means they are same as Wapo? Who are you kidding with that BS.

Recently there is not very much difference between the Washington Oost and National Enquirer — which is the exact problem, the Washington Post has sunk to the level of being a tabloid paper primarily focused on sexual innuendo rather than political policy, The founders of the Post must be rolling in their graves.

 

[exGOPer]

Recently there is not very much difference between the Washington Oost and National Enquirer — which is the exact problem, the Washington Post has sunk to the level of being a tabloid paper primarily focused on sexual innuendo rather than political policy, The founders of the Post must be rolling in their graves.

So outing a conservative pedophile who would have direct impact on national policy with his voting is not related to political policy? Nothing WaPo posted was fake unlike NE which regularly posts absolute garbage. You can't deny the facts so you have resorted to false equivalence as usual.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

Thread title makes no sense.

 

[gwb-trading]

So outing a conservative pedophile who would have direct impact on national policy with his voting is not related to political policy? Nothing WaPo posted was fake unlike NE which regularly posts absolute garbage. You can't deny the facts so you have resorted to false equivalence as usual.

Even the Washington Post article states that they deliberately sent two reporters to Alabama for the sole purpose of digging up dirt on this story. How far do your journalistic standards need to sink before this becomes the focus of your paper -- digging up decades old sexual innuendos on people? Welcome to the new National Enquirer -- the Washington Post.

 

[exGOPer]

Even the Washington Post article states that they deliberately sent two reporters to Alabama for the sole purpose of digging up dirt on this story. How far do your journalistic standards need to sink before this becomes the focus of your paper -- digging up decades old sexual innuendos on people? Welcome to the new National Enquirer -- the Washington Post.

You are just lying now.

"While reporting a story in Alabama about supporters of Moore’s Senate campaign, a Post reporter heard that Moore allegedly had sought relationships with teenage girls. Over the ensuing three weeks, two Post reporters contacted and interviewed the four women. All were initially reluctant to speak publicly but chose to do so after multiple interviews, saying they thought it was important for people to know about their interactions with Moore. The women say they don’t know one another."


https://www.washingtonpost.com/inve...495878-c293-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0_story.html

Moore's pedophilia exploits were well known as more stories are coming out, a reporter overheard and researched it. What is so nefarious about this? Aren't reporters supposed to follow up on such serious allegations?

 

[gwb-trading]

You are just lying now.

"While reporting a story in Alabama about supporters of Moore’s Senate campaign, a Post reporter heard that Moore allegedly had sought relationships with teenage girls. Over the ensuing three weeks, two Post reporters contacted and interviewed the four women. All were initially reluctant to speak publicly but chose to do so after multiple interviews, saying they thought it was important for people to know about their interactions with Moore. The women say they don’t know one another."


https://www.washingtonpost.com/inve...495878-c293-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0_story.html

Moore's pedophilia exploits were well known as more stories are coming out, a reporter overheard and researched it. What is so nefarious about this? Aren't reporters supposed to follow up on such serious allegations?

So two Post reporters sought out out and interviewed four woman. They deliberately targeted the creation of this story. It is exactly as I have stated.

Would the Post have done this in 1964, or 1982, or 1991, or 2001 -- the answer is No.

Now the Washington Post goes out and deliberately digs up smut that they would have NEVER reported on in the past. Welcome to the new National Enquirer.

 

[exGOPer]

So two Post reporters sought out out and interviewed four woman. They deliberately targeted the creation of this story. It is exactly as I have stated.

Would the Post have done this in 1964, or 1982, or 1991, or 2001 -- the answer is No.

Now the Washington Post goes out and deliberately digs up smut that they would have NEVER reported on in the past. Welcome to the new National Enquirer.

Roy Moore never ran for a national seat in the past, that's what caused this story to be 'dug up' when in fact this was common knowledge that Moore is a pedophile.

NE makes stuff up everyday, I can post multiple false claims from them that they never retracted. To compare that to a pedo being outed by WaPo who tried to have a vote on national issues is a false equivalence at the level of Breitbart.

 

[exGOPer]

So two Post reporters sought out out and interviewed four woman. They deliberately targeted the creation of this story. It is exactly as I have stated.

Would the Post have done this in 1964, or 1982, or 1991, or 2001 -- the answer is No.

Now the Washington Post goes out and deliberately digs up smut that they would have NEVER reported on in the past. Welcome to the new National Enquirer.

Also, NE doesn't send reporters, they hear something and publish it as fact, 9 times out of 10 it's a complete hoax. I doubt NE even has reporters.