Please do not misunderstand what I am saying. I think what is coming will be much worse than your description. When -- not if -- the major industrial nations lose their coveted AAA and AA credit ratings I believe we will see increasingly chaotic conditions. I think the September '08 through March '09 period equates to 1929 and 1930 not '32 and ''33.
The piper is yet to be paid.
But you, and others in this thread say things like -- "I think it's wise to begin looking at diversifying our securities outside of US control for reasons of safety as well as tax efficiency" -- as if that offers a real level of protection and or control. You are right the US is one of the few countries to tax foreign income.
BUT IT DOES!
And, if you continue to remain a US citizen you will either tell them where your offshore financial assets are, or you will commit tax fraud. I am OK with you doing either -- it is you life and your choice. But to talk of "diversifying assets" as if the US Courts do not have the authority to order those assets be brought back here is simply foolish. In practical terms the US citizen has a very hard time protecting himself unless he is willing to say goodbye to his US passport and even then their are recapture provisions.
In the 70's I once spent five hours in a trust attorney's office in Vaduz negotiating the formation of a charitable trust that in turn was to control a BVI Corp. The trust was to be controlled by the foreign wife of an American citizen. The laws have been changed since but at the time a wife that you trusted that was also not an American citizen was worth her weight in diamonds in this type of offshore financial planning.
It took five hours of very careful drafting to get it right working with one of Lichtenstien's top tax authorities. And that is when the regs were MUCH looser. For those unfamiliar with Lichtenstein and it's capital Vaduz it is where the Swiss have historically gone to obtain true confidentiality.
The realities of practical business are often a good deal more complex than they appear to be from the comfortable chair in your study. Doing these types of transaction yet remaining protected from US taxation is much more difficult than the casual observer perceives.
Yes ... you are correct that this country is in trouble. But ... no, you can't just fly to the Caymans, have dinner on the beach, see Coutes & Co. the next morning and fly home with it done.
Most of the real options are astonishingly unattractive in 2010. Your best bet? Make lots of money and keep the balances in a diversified group of inflation resistant assets with an emphasis on having half your wealth in things that are difficult to confiscate. A well chosen portfolio of copyrights, shale oil royalties etc will balance off the precious metals which run some risk of confiscation.
And of course a nimble trader will earn enormous sums regardless of the regulation.
This is not an area for superficial thinking. It does not hold up.
So, while you do not think so ... I still do think so.
Quote from SNYP40A1:
I don't think so. I didn't create this thread purely out of the tax efficiency question. It's also about questioning whether the US is really the best place to hold ALL of our assets going forward. The US is one of the very few countries that taxes people based on citizenship and not by where they actually live. Does that scare anyone else? It's like being in a mafia family, they want a piece of the action no matter where you go. Furthermore, I think a lot of people are uncertain about where this country is headed. We have an increasing percentage of the population who do not want to work and only wants to live off of others. They want what we have. These people would have been weeded out by natural selection 100 years ago, but today we have programs to ensure they remain well-represented in the population. I am not talking genetics or biology, I'm talking about culture. There's a growing culture of people who are perfectly happy living off of others. The political system is well aware of this fact and they manipulate it for votes. All that matters is gaining the majority of the vote and since we have an increasing population of people who want wealth redistribution (currently done through massive government spending which will inevitably translate into higher taxes for some), because I guess it's "unfair" to be wealthy, then someday perhaps all a politician needs to do to get elected is say, "90% tax on the wealthy and Spanish will be recognized as a second national language". Anyway, I am going off on a rant here, but the point is, I think it's wise to begin looking at diversifying our securities outside of US control for reasons of safety as well as tax efficiency.