Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. Voltaire
Benghazi Survivor calls Obama Cowardly ass Scum
- Thread starter Max E.
- Start date
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. Voltaire
Do you deny the veracity of politifact then?
I could not care less what they think, but i want to know what your ""Official opinion" is.
I understand she didnt provide more security.I also understand she requested funding for it from The Republican House and was denied and The Republican House had the embassy security budget cut.
I am not going to start down the road of replaying that entire episode but it is important to keep the backstory of Benghazi in mind:
Libya was Hillary's and Obama's personal war. No one else's. So they needed to have it look good and look like it was a success story for the second election. Keep that in mind because it controlled all of the decisions that Hillary made. She would not allow Benghazi/Libya to look like it was in chaos. She wanted to show it as a civilian government that was now on its way to becoming a little democracy.
Meanwhile, Chris Stevens was increasingly complaining the black flag of Al Queda was flying all over town and near the embassy. And the Brits had withdrawn from their embassy because believed they were in immediate danger and had already experienced an attack. Ditto for the Red Cross/Crescent. They had abandoned ship. The general who was the head of Africom was aware of the danger and offered to position troops on standby (this was in the days before the attack) but Stevens declined the request because allegedly he was under orders from the State Department to not do or allow anything that gave the appearance that the military was still needed there. Again, this was supposed to be a civilian Jeffersonian democracy shaping up as a result of Obama's and Hillary's personal war.
That whole bit about being hypersensitive about the use of troops or anything that looked like military mucked up the whole thing. If left to themselves, the military would stationed troops near the embassy and taken the motherfuckers out as needed. It was not a lack of funding, it was a lack of authorization to use available forces.
In the end, military personnel attempted to respond but the whole thing bogged down into a complete clown show as they changed in and out of uniform depending on which message they were getting. Again, even at the most critical timing, they were under orders to hide the fact that they were military because that made it look like Hilllary's success story required troops to hold it together- and she wasnt going to get elected president some day that way.
Basically, Chris Stevens was a trooper. He volunteered to go to a shithole country on the front lines of the State Department to help make Hillary's fiasco a success story. And she abandoned him. Bullfeathers, to the funding argument. Resources were ready to pre-position to help the embassy so that the attack would not have happened in the first place and were ready to respond when it did. But Hillary did not want a military intervention to undermine her success story. Stevens died out on the front lines of diplomatic service to his country sure as shiite. Contrast this with some beltway bloviating senator dildo claiming to be Sparticus because he pushed a couple of pieces of paper across the table.
Read this little clown show- link below- and then tell me where I am going wrong. Better yet. Keep it to yourself. I have already seen some tards take a running shot today at recycling old tired bullshit about Benghazi, funding arguments, etc. Oh, and dont forget to take a shot at replaying the bit about the guy in his basement in California making videos that were the cause of the attack in the first place. I mean if you are going to drink the kool-aid, go big.
https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/ne...ebate-on-weapons-and-uniforms-commander-says/
Libya was Hillary's and Obama's personal war. No one else's. So they needed to have it look good and look like it was a success story for the second election. Keep that in mind because it controlled all of the decisions that Hillary made. She would not allow Benghazi/Libya to look like it was in chaos. She wanted to show it as a civilian government that was now on its way to becoming a little democracy.
Meanwhile, Chris Stevens was increasingly complaining the black flag of Al Queda was flying all over town and near the embassy. And the Brits had withdrawn from their embassy because believed they were in immediate danger and had already experienced an attack. Ditto for the Red Cross/Crescent. They had abandoned ship. The general who was the head of Africom was aware of the danger and offered to position troops on standby (this was in the days before the attack) but Stevens declined the request because allegedly he was under orders from the State Department to not do or allow anything that gave the appearance that the military was still needed there. Again, this was supposed to be a civilian Jeffersonian democracy shaping up as a result of Obama's and Hillary's personal war.
That whole bit about being hypersensitive about the use of troops or anything that looked like military mucked up the whole thing. If left to themselves, the military would stationed troops near the embassy and taken the motherfuckers out as needed. It was not a lack of funding, it was a lack of authorization to use available forces.
In the end, military personnel attempted to respond but the whole thing bogged down into a complete clown show as they changed in and out of uniform depending on which message they were getting. Again, even at the most critical timing, they were under orders to hide the fact that they were military because that made it look like Hilllary's success story required troops to hold it together- and she wasnt going to get elected president some day that way.
Basically, Chris Stevens was a trooper. He volunteered to go to a shithole country on the front lines of the State Department to help make Hillary's fiasco a success story. And she abandoned him. Bullfeathers, to the funding argument. Resources were ready to pre-position to help the embassy so that the attack would not have happened in the first place and were ready to respond when it did. But Hillary did not want a military intervention to undermine her success story. Stevens died out on the front lines of diplomatic service to his country sure as shiite. Contrast this with some beltway bloviating senator dildo claiming to be Sparticus because he pushed a couple of pieces of paper across the table.
Read this little clown show- link below- and then tell me where I am going wrong. Better yet. Keep it to yourself. I have already seen some tards take a running shot today at recycling old tired bullshit about Benghazi, funding arguments, etc. Oh, and dont forget to take a shot at replaying the bit about the guy in his basement in California making videos that were the cause of the attack in the first place. I mean if you are going to drink the kool-aid, go big.
https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/ne...ebate-on-weapons-and-uniforms-commander-says/
Last edited:
So it is your contention now, that a cut by 1/10000th of the military budget led to a disaster?
Or do the leaders hold some responsibility?
Last edited:
128 and 331 million is quite significant for the specific budget of embassy security.As Ambassador Stevens Doctor sister said Hillary did the best she could with what she had.
In fiscal year 2011, lawmakers shaved $128 million off of the administration’s request for embassy security funding. House Republicans drained off even more funds in fiscal year 2012 — cutting back on the department’s request by $331 million"
LOL, math is not your strong suit bro. We will have to leave it at that....... I could embarass you again, but its not worth my time, thats math.
"Numbers" dont work well when your only argument is "Racist."
LOL, math is not your strong suit bro. We will have to leave it at that....... I could embarass you again, but its not worth my time, thats math.
"Numbers" dont work well when your only argument is "Racist."
He spelled embarrass incorrectly.
Expect the same discussion in a month, they are programmed.
Max E. is still licking his NKE wound and a bit of Poutine off his fat chops.
LOL, math is not your strong suit bro. We will have to leave it at that....... I could embarass you again, but its not worth my time, thats math.
"Numbers" dont work well when your only argument is "Racist."
Yes your time would be better spent working on your stock picking skills than continueing to get owned by me good night.
Last edited: