Be Afraid. Be Very Afraid.

I don't disagree. But we don't have one. Nor does anyone else. Hence the silliness of the remark than an informed electorate would vote for anyone who isn't a Democrat simply to avoid Communism.

It isn't about Democrats or Republicans. To believe that it is leads to manipulation by those who know what buttons to push and what buzzwords to use to ignite the sort of rants that are so common.

I will agree, it's not about democrats or republicans. But if the voters we had in the last election were informed on the issues - truly informed - instead of subject to marketing campaigns or in it for themselves (Whats in it for me??), the results would probably have been very different. We will never know, unfortunately.
 
I will agree, it's not about democrats or republicans. But if the voters we had in the last election were informed on the issues - truly informed - instead of subject to marketing campaigns or in it for themselves (Whats in it for me??), the results would probably have been very different. We will never know, unfortunately.

Since nearly all politicians of whatever party are "owned" by "big business", it would have made no difference. But that won't change until the Supreme Court reverses Buckley v Valeo, and even then it will most likely be too late.
 
I those those people are perhaps dumber than those Jay Leno used to interview in his Jaywalking segments. And one idiot thought Bernie Sanders was Boehner ......

Watch the "Watters' World" segment on O'Reilly's show. You'd think the majority of Americans are totally ignorant an clueless... yet, they get to vote... and for the likes of Odumbo.

No wonder America is going down the shitter.

:(
 
All this talk of voting and being "informed" etc is so quaint. I can promise you the people running the DNC find it hilarious.

The election will come down to a question of whether the democrats can keep their vote fraud operation functioning. If they can routinely turn out 100% of all "voters" in urban precincts and have them vote 100% for the democrat, USSR-style, it is going to be pretty hard for anyone else.

Same with the Senate. Their playbook in any close race is to hold off "counting " the votes in inner city preceincts until they know exactly how many votes the democrat will need to squeek past. Then they miraculously find enough votes to close the deal. The Al Franken "victory" was the most notorious but only because it came in a state of unsophisticated farmers and Lutherans who naively believed that honest elections were important. In places like Illinois, Ohio, New York, etc, they don't even pretend to be honest. No one is going to prosecute them, so what is the risk?

If the "late votes" ploy fails, the fall back onto the litigated recount. We saw how this works in 2000. Find some democrat judge who will twist the election law anyway necessary to give them the chance to manufacture more votes.

The part you have to love is how they squeal when it doesn't work. The entire democrat victim machine turns out in force to denounce the results as a travesty. Republicans are counseled to accept defeat graciously, even if tainted. When did a democrat ever do that?

The sheer ferocity with which they oppose common sense propsals to require minimal IDs for voting and to prevent multi-state voting and limit voting to legitimate state residents shows just how important fraud is to them. Eric Holder can't find time to produce documents requested by congress or look into obstruction of justice at the IRS, but he has suits going against several states over ID laws.
 
Since nearly all politicians of whatever party are "owned" by "big business", it would have made no difference. But that won't change until the Supreme Court reverses Buckley v Valeo, and even then it will most likely be too late.

You seem to believe that both democrats and republicans are owned and driven by big business without any real care for the people - yet you shill here for democrats. All of your posts rail against the GOP. So either you're lying about your comment re: both parties in the lame attempt to appear like you're not partisan or....?
 
Back
Top