All this talk of voting and being "informed" etc is so quaint. I can promise you the people running the DNC find it hilarious.
The election will come down to a question of whether the democrats can keep their vote fraud operation functioning. If they can routinely turn out 100% of all "voters" in urban precincts and have them vote 100% for the democrat, USSR-style, it is going to be pretty hard for anyone else.
Same with the Senate. Their playbook in any close race is to hold off "counting " the votes in inner city preceincts until they know exactly how many votes the democrat will need to squeek past. Then they miraculously find enough votes to close the deal. The Al Franken "victory" was the most notorious but only because it came in a state of unsophisticated farmers and Lutherans who naively believed that honest elections were important. In places like Illinois, Ohio, New York, etc, they don't even pretend to be honest. No one is going to prosecute them, so what is the risk?
If the "late votes" ploy fails, the fall back onto the litigated recount. We saw how this works in 2000. Find some democrat judge who will twist the election law anyway necessary to give them the chance to manufacture more votes.
The part you have to love is how they squeal when it doesn't work. The entire democrat victim machine turns out in force to denounce the results as a travesty. Republicans are counseled to accept defeat graciously, even if tainted. When did a democrat ever do that?
The sheer ferocity with which they oppose common sense propsals to require minimal IDs for voting and to prevent multi-state voting and limit voting to legitimate state residents shows just how important fraud is to them. Eric Holder can't find time to produce documents requested by congress or look into obstruction of justice at the IRS, but he has suits going against several states over ID laws.