Quote from Chood:
Strap it on, combat joined: long Aussie future under .7800.
Bought ten of my 14 long AUS futures slightly under .7800. To date, on those ten, the max profit versus max drawdown is better than 20 to 1, attributable mainly to puny drawdown. The entries are excellent, in other words. The purchases came over two sessions, the second shown by the post above.
My other four longs, entered in each case after the purchases under .7800 have a much less favorable reward/risk profile. I am ahead on all four of those longs, but the max profit to max drawdown is only a little better than 1 to 1 (i.e., pedestrian).
News of late presents two scenarios: RBA reportedly is selling Aus dollars, and it has a track record (reportedly) of top and bottom picking the Aus dollar. Bank currency traders in Aus reportedly are long (my side), believing that a combination of Aus yield versus USA and strength in Aus commodities will push Aussie to .8000 in short order. Both could be right, of course, with a continuing move up followed by a large drop over the long term. RBA presumably buys and sells with a longer term view than traders.
Anyone else with a stake in this problem? It is a problem, after all, with a resolution that traders can help create. For instance, I can create a resolution by selling my 14 longs promptly, bagging the nice equity I expect will re-appear when Globex resumes trading, or I can wait on a home run move above .8000. Where I place my stops similarly can create a resolution.