Quote from Clubber Lang:
It's called liberalism
Handguns offer advantages and disadvantages. The two main disadvantages is that without a lot of training most people can't hit the side of a barn with a handgun. Many combat veterans say that their side arm is just there in case they get separated from their rifle to keep the enemy back until they can make their way back to their main weapon.Quote from AAAintheBeltway:
Handguns are convenient for home defense. They can be quickly deployed. The main problems are accuracy, capacity and the inability to defeat kevlar.
Quote from 377OHMS:
Who mistakes a semi for a full-auto? Don't liberals serve in the military?
I've noticed the left couldn't even wait one day to start politicizing what occurred. There are 20 sets of parents out there who are completely destroyed and will never be ok again for the rest of their lives.
Bloomberg was up in front of a podium pontificating about weapons bans a few hours after these kids were killed. Obama spoke because he is expected to and I thought he did a good job.
You can't fix this with a law.
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:
People that don't know the difference, as a matter of fact all full auto does is waste ammo.
When I was in the Army they were in the process of switching to 3 round bursts for increased accuracy and conservation of ammo.
I can assure you humping shit loads of ammo ain't no fun and slows you down.
Might want to ask leapup.
I don't think that is a fair analogy. It isn't like one day the gov. would show up with heavy weaponry to quell a population. The population would also have the advantage of blending in and attacking at strategic locations and claiming some heavy weapons for themselves if it got that far.Quote from kmgilroy89:
Lets pretend the government wanted to take over. You bring your fully automatic weapons. They'll bring their tanks and air bombers. We'll see who wins.
Quote from pspr:
I don't think that is a fair analogy. It isn't like one day the gov. would show up with heavy weaponry to quell a population. The population would also have the advantage of blending in and attacking at strategic locations and claiming some heavy weapons for themselves if it got that far.
For instance, you don't hear about the Taliban having anything other than rifles, explosives and RPG's. Yet, they have kept our military busy for 10 years trying to defeat them. It's not always the size of the weapon but the tactics that decide a conflict or war.
However, without handguns and rifles in the hands of the civilian population there is no battle. We would be like the Palestinians throwing rocks at the Israelis and be easily put down at will.
Quote from bigarrow:
Hey Mr. clubber, our good friend oo7 didn't understand the point of the post. There aren't killings using fully automatic weapons because the gun control laws and restrictions making them hard to get and own is working. He's funny when he gets all worked up.