it is the logical conclusion when you basically accused EU bodies of either intentionally pushing Greece into a corner it never could recover from or of being grossly negligent and borderline stupid in not knowing that Greece would not be able to recover. You yourself ruled out intentional harm so given the fact that hundreds of billions were and are at stake and claiming anyone would not do their due diligence lends a touch of hubris and arrogance to you. And the logical extension is that given all the experts, who spent weeks if not months in Greece to assess the situation before anyone was bailed out, by your judgement were too negligent or naive points to you believing you know it better than everyone else. Got it now or still unclear?
Do we have to walk through this exercise now every time you say something?
We have to walk through it if you cannot understand the simple commentary I've made, sure. I never said anyone did anything evil or toxic, etc. All I said was either the Troika did not do it's due diligence in determining whether or not the Greeks could repay loans of that magnitude, or they had another reason for providing it - namely that the money was actually intended to go to their financial institutions - not the Greeks. That doesn't make anyone evil, just gives it a different purpose - the purpose of being concerned over their institutions in their home countries.
Got it now or still unclear?