Totally immature take on the issue. You work with the resources available to get the best possible outcome. Trump is ending with the worst possible outcome - children in cages and a bottleneck in the court system.
According to the donkeys at MSNBC, we are now running concentration camps.
- Thread starter Max E.
- Start date
Totally immature take on the issue. You work with the resources available to get the best possible outcome. Trump is ending with the worst possible outcome - children in cages and a bottleneck in the court system.
And 40-60% of the women coming have been raped/otherwise sexually assaulted on the way up, which presumably many of the kids have had to watch and will watch again on the return trip. What is ill-conceived is the actions of you and your ilk that continue to encourage/condone the idea that they should come.
As I said, the bottleneck is caused by not just releasing people into the community which Obama did, knowing that he would be long gone and at some point others would need to deal with the hard work of fixing the immigration problem.
Trump is not home watching the Price is Right as your candidate is. He has to do the real work. Not that Hillary would have done it either. How much work does it take to just keep the welcome mat there.
Meh.
The Washington Post is reporting that Trump is considering ending his zero tolerance policy of prosecutions of migrant parents with children at the border. I wonder why?
The Washington Post is reporting that Trump is considering ending his zero tolerance policy of prosecutions of migrant parents with children at the border. I wonder why?
See my other reply.
Probably because of the obvious: Without the wall, the number of people who are subject to prosecution is beyond the capacity to prosecute them- which has always been and continues to be the lefty plan.
No one doubts that whatever Trump accomplishes will eventually be reversed by a democratic regime the next time they are in power. We are in the last chapter of even pretending to resist.
Contrary to what you might think, I dont necessarily disagree with temporarily suspending the prosecutions until we are set up to deal with the volume. The difference is that my position is not a thinly veiled way of kicking the can down the road and doing nothing as it is with you and your ilk.
As I said a couple days, ago. I would take a large portion of our funding of the UN and immediately assign massive, massive, massive dollars and resources to meet our responsibilities on the border. Which would also further what should be the goals of the UN so it is not a taking away of dollars for their mission. It would be a taking away of dollars from the America Hate Club to- instead- further humanitarian needs and inter-country issues - basic goals of the UN before the camel fuckers looking to stick their finger in our eye every day commandeered the whole place.
Last edited:
See my other reply to your other reply.
Right and wrong. The court system is getting totally mucked because Trump didn’t have the insight to not fuck it up. Too much Fox News.
You’re wrong about the border. There can be a wall and more judges and a speedy process but there has to be protections for those here already and in good standing.
That’s known as bending but not breaking.
And as we know, to your ilk "in good standing" means here illegally but not having any further criminal violations. That is the basic Obama era doctrine, which said that if you could just get here and stay out of further trouble everything would be okay and eventually there would be a pathway to legality.
And that is one of the main drivers of immigrants still coming.
But I thought you said a wall would stop immigrants from coming? Is it not the panacea King Donald promised?