Abrupt catastrophic climate change a real possibility

[jem]

wrong... I told you to go away because the vast majority of your posts are part of your
douche derail and distract strategy.

fc posts his crap on my threads and I post on his since the time your handle was being used by a person trying to teach about price and volume.

You don't want people interfering with your threads. Why are you so intent on interfering with those of others?

 

[dbphoenix]

fc posts his crap on my threads and I post on his

And you're how old?

 

[jem]

perfect example of your douche derail and distract strategy.

And you're how old?

 

[dbphoenix]

perfect example of your douche derail and distract strategy.

Pertinent though it may be . . .

 

[murray t turtle]

%%%%%
Its a shame they changed the name again.Global cooling sounded so scary.Well @ Least, as IBD noted ; ''guess what the climate always changes.'' LOL

 

[dbphoenix]

%%%%%
Its a shame they changed the name again.Global cooling sounded so scary.Well @ Least, as IBD noted ; ''guess what the climate always changes.'' LOL

Though I can't say for sure without seeing the context, I suspect that like so many others they're confusing "climate" with "weather".

 

[fhl]

%%%%%
Its a shame they changed the name again.Global cooling sounded so scary.Well @ Least, as IBD noted ; ''guess what the climate always changes.'' LOL

“When did ‘global warming’ become ‘climate change’?” the talk show host asked Kimberley Strassel of The Wall Street Journal.

“It became ‘climate change’ when you couldn’t prove that there was much global warming anymore, as the temperatures didn’t change,” she said. “So, suddenly we had to have this catch-all term, what was responsible [which] meant that any change in the weather somehow supported the theory.”



Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...nge-tack-its-the-economy-stupi/#ixzz3EjOOgo3x
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

 

[wjk]

the one thing both sides agree on is these new nuclear plants are a lot safer and they have addressed the waste problem. But speaking of problems, even Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and George Soros combined can't afford to build one. So you have to get the money from us poor little taxpayers. I'd be willing to fork over a few dollars for a safe reliable clean source of energy that someday may be more affordable than coal or nat gas.

what do you think?

Nuclear Fusion. They could dump some of their big bucks into research and help speed things up. Some progress is being made.

http://arstechnica.com/science/2014...entists-get-more-energy-out-than-fuel-put-in/

 

[dbphoenix]

Nuclear Fusion. They could dump some of their big bucks into research and help speed things up. Some progress is being made.

http://arstechnica.com/science/2014...entists-get-more-energy-out-than-fuel-put-in/

Interesting. Thank you.

 

[murray t turtle]

“When did ‘global warming’ become ‘climate change’?” the talk show host asked Kimberley Strassel of The Wall Street Journal.

“It became ‘climate change’ when you couldn’t prove that there was much global warming anymore, as the temperatures didn’t change,” she said. “So, suddenly we had to have this catch-all term, what was responsible [which] meant that any change in the weather somehow supported the theory.”



Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...nge-tack-its-the-economy-stupi/#ixzz3EjOOgo3x
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

%%%%%%
Good points.The founder of the weather channel said algore should be sued for fraud.