Abortion Rights Score Huge Victory In Kansas

The line needs to be drawn....The public wants that also
Unless you argue for unlimited abortion including partial birth abortion then the state and court needs to determine when a fetus has due rights.
It a tough line to draw....You seems to be promoting partial birth abortion if the mother chooses ( always an exception for health of the mother)

View attachment 291015

What part of all rights have limits did you not understand?
 
The line needs to be drawn....The public wants that also
Unless you argue for unlimited abortion including partial birth abortion then the state and court needs to determine when a fetus has due rights.
It a tough line to draw....You seems to be promoting partial birth abortion if the mother chooses ( always an exception for health of the mother)

View attachment 291015


The line was drawn with Roe.
 
How come the GOP does not count the fetus when it does a census then...
Thats an interesting point.....Kinda of a stoner type question
Primary purpose of the census is to allocate resources and appropriation of congressional seats
 
Last edited:
Does the fetus have rights to limit
Your case says the Mother has all rights and the fetus has none

My case is it’s none of our business. The question is really when to allow a medical procedure.
 
He's got you right where he wants you, arguing as if the fetus is a person.

There’s a place for the viability argument, in my opinion, and medical ethics. The real question is do we take the de minimus viability as the standard as if all fetuses will grow outside of the womb at x weeks. If that were the case the women could just birth babies at 8 weeks.

The heartbeat argument is foolish too. A liver and kidneys is just as vital as heart. They don’t talk about other organs for some reason.
 
Back
Top