ABC Obtains FBI Agents’ Texts, ‘Secret Society’ Comment Appears to Have Been Made in Jest

[exGOPer]

You fucking idiot, of course he said it in jest. The server was already in the FBI's possession. How the hell could the "Russians" find the emails.
What a tool.

So tell me something, why was Trump campaign PAYING an OPERATIVE to obtain 'emails' if they didn't they think they existed and it was all in jest?

"In May 2017 Smith told the Wall Street Journal that he had been actively involved, during the 2016 presidential election campaign, in trying to obtain emails he believed had been deleted from Hillary Clinton's computer server.[10][11] In that quest he contacted several known hacker groups, including some Russian groups.[12] He claimed he was working on behalf of Trump campaign advisor Mike Flynn

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_W._Smith

https://lawfareblog.com/time-i-got-recruited-collude-russians

 

[Buy1Sell2]

Give me a link. Or shut your pie hole. You can't and you know it.

Who are you talking to Arnie?

 

[Spike Trader]

2 u.

 

[Spike Trader]

lol . . . . it's so easy to play those Fox News morons ,


Fox hypes bogus FBI ‘secret society’ dozens of times — then goes silent after it’s revealed as a joke

Fox News on Thursday ceased discussion about an alleged anti-Trump “secret society” in the FBI after the notion was revealed as a joke.

According to TV Eyes, Fox News made 90 mentions of the so-called “secret society” in January. The network and GOP guests alleged that text message showed that FBI agents were out to get President Donald Trump.

However, text messages obtained by ABC News on Wednesday suggested that FBI agents were joking when they used the term “secret society.”

But that report was never mentioned by Fox News and there is no record of a clarification from the conservative network.

Media Matters’ Lis Power counted 20 mentions of “secret society” just on the Tuesday and Wednesday editions Fox & Friends, widely considered to be Trump’s favorite morning show.

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/01/fo...ciety-dozens-times-goes-silent-revealed-joke/

 

[LacesOut]

Talking about semantics, when your moral leader fucked a hooker, he said she reminded him of his daughter, few days back we were discussing the morality of all this, could you ask your family members or recite from your personal experience whether all conservatives do this? They fuck pros because they remind them of their daughter or grand daughters? I am curious because it seems strange and given you call me 'groper', I want to know what your standards for groping is. You defend that incestuous creep but seemingly are upset about random internet people for their imaginary groping. So do ask and report back.

How long have you been an ExGroper? Just curious what made you stop...

 

[exGOPer]

How long have you been an ExGroper? Just curious what made you stop...

Fear of double chinned dementia.

 

[Cuddles]

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politi...text-messages-from-former-mueller-team-member

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powe...22769454f82_story.html?utm_term=.831c0cdb30a9

Oh lawd.... The propaganda machine about to work overtime

 

[Good1]

Bullshit, the very day he said there will be big news on Hillary, his son was meeting with Russian government lawyers for info on Clinton. And nobody said Russia 'had them all', which fake press? What is with you people and just making shit up.

Wait, so you're saying Russia had anywhere from some to less than all of the Secretary of States emails? So you're saying her private server was compromised? And you're saying representatives of the Russian Federation offered to give those compromised emails to Trump? And you're saying his son flew to Moscow and walked into the Kremlin demanding those emails?

Wouldn't it have been easier for Trump to joke, "Hey, NSA, if you have all of Hillary's emails, please give them to me!"

What being said is that Russian govt. is PROMOTING this campaign just like they did with Trump. PROMOTING something is NOT same as RUNNING it.

Its frustrating that only conversations on politics you can have with Cons is to argue on basic rudiments of truth, there are so many lies to address, it's hard to get beyond to the issues of policy or belifs.

Wait, are you saying you watched the exact same Joe Scarecrower show that i did, and you know what word the pundit used? If you didn't see the same Joe Scareboring show that i did, how would you know...unless you have the same talking points as the pundit?

 

[exGOPer]

Wait, so you're saying Russia had anywhere from some to less than all of the Secretary of States emails? So you're saying her private server was compromised? And you're saying representatives of the Russian Federation offered to give those compromised emails to Trump? And you're saying his son flew to Moscow and walked into the Kremlin demanding those emails?

Just like in market, one doesn't have to actually have something to be PERCEIVED to having something. It's the concept of VALUE, perception is reality and given how dumb the Trump family is, it's not difficult to make them believe.

The basic fact is that if Hillary's emails were compromised, we would have seen it by now.

Wouldn't it have been easier for Trump to joke, "Hey, NSA, if you have all of Hillary's emails, please give them to me!"

And Hillary would have said 'Hey IRS, I know you have Trump's taxes', please give them to me'.

That would have worked too right?

Why do I have to explain this?

Wait, are you saying you watched the exact same Joe Scarecrower show that i did, and you know what word the pundit used? If you didn't see the same Joe Scareboring show that i did, how would you know...unless you have the same talking points as the pundit?

Blah blah blah

I don't watch political shows on TV, I don't watch TV, who cares about what some paid pundit said. Stop being outraged over every little shit.

 

[Good1]

Blah blah blah

I don't watch political shows on TV, I don't watch TV, who cares about what some paid pundit said. Stop being outraged over every little shit.

Not so fast there. You said, "What's being said is...", telling me what the pundit said on the Joe Scarebrow show. But now you say you don't even watch TV. So how do you know "what's being said"...unless you have a list of the same talking points?