ABC Obtains FBI Agents’ Texts, ‘Secret Society’ Comment Appears to Have Been Made in Jest

[exGOPer]

Not so fast there. You said, "What's being said is...", telling me what the pundit said on the Joe Scarebrow show. But now you say you don't even watch TV. So how do you know "what's being said"...unless you have a list of the same talking points?

So just because it was said on that show means that's the only place it was said?

Google 'russia bots memo' and see for yourself. It was reported on ALL major political news site. Who gives a shit that some TV pundit mentioned it? Did he do the research himself? No, he was just yapping

And by the way, I have linked to tracking Russian bot activity last year in this thread.

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/tracking-russian-trolls.314399/

I check it time to time and saw the tag spike before it was even reported.

And why the fck is this a talking point? These are FACTS, indisputable, just because you feel victimized as a Trump supporter because of what it implies, they don't stop being facts.

 

[Good1]

Just like in market, one doesn't have to actually have something to be PERCEIVED to having something. It's the concept of VALUE, perception is reality and given how dumb the Trump family is, it's not difficult to make them believe.

The basic fact is that if Hillary's emails were compromised, we would have seen it by now.

Wait, so you're saying someone who represents the Russian Federation created the perception that they had anywhere from some to all of the emails of a former Sec of State? And they sold that perception to Trump's son?

 

[Good1]

So just because it was said on that show means that's the only place it was said?

Google 'russia bots memo' and see for yourself. It was reported on ALL major political news site. Who gives a shit that some TV pundit mentioned it? Did he do the research himself? No, he was just yapping

And by the way, I have linked to tracking Russian bot activity last year in this thread.

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/tracking-russian-trolls.314399/

I check it time to time and saw the tag spike before it was even reported.

And why the fck is this a talking point? These are FACTS, indisputable, just because you feel victimized as a Trump supporter because of what it implies, they don't stop being facts.

So there IS a list of talking points that "ALL" major political news sites (which you don't watch) are adhering to? And from those talking points, you can be sure what the pundit said on the Joe Scareharrow show?

 

[exGOPer]

So there IS a list of talking points that "ALL" major political news sites (which you don't watch) are adhering to? And from those talking points, you can be sure what the pundit said on the Joe Scareharrow show?

I see you are beyond help, you are in the zone of eternal victimhood, the place where every conservative is. In fact, conservatism is based on that very notion - how the process of natural change is a conspiracy against their little safe-spaces of homogeneity and consistency.

Let's even give you that, let's even ACCEPT your accusation that it's a talking point.

My next question is - SO FUCKING WHAT?

Are they based on facts? Do you care about facts? If not, then whatever you say is irrelevant. But if you do care about facts then the next question is - WHY are Russian bots consistently pushing conservative memes and fake news sites?

Instead of asking why and how, you are blaming people who report on them as the real problem.

 

[Good1]

I see you are beyond help, you are in the zone of eternal victimhood, the place where every conservative is. In fact, conservatism is based on that very notion - how the process of natural change is a conspiracy against their little safe-spaces of homogeneity and consistency.

Ad hominum. Not an argument.

Let's even give you that, let's even ACCEPT your accusation that it's a talking point.

My next question is - SO FUCKING WHAT?

Well maybe the talking points are being put out by an actor(s) hostile to the election process of the United States...like some rogue moles deep in the CIA...or a secret society in the FBI.

Are they based on facts? Do you care about facts? If not, then whatever you say is irrelevant.

Likewise, if the pundit on the Joe Scarewierdo show did not state a fact, and did not care about facts, how is what he said relevant?

The relevance may be the talking points he was following.

But if you do care about facts then the next question is - WHY are Russian bots consistently pushing conservative memes and fake news sites?

I do care about facts, so the next question is, why are pundits on "ALL" major political shows functioning like bots repeating the same memes? And without offering any evidence?

Instead of asking why and how, you are blaming people who report on them as the real problem.

It appears you are blaming me (see ad hominum above) for asking the questions that a good reporter would/should ask, instead of swallowing the memes of pundit bots repeating the same talking points without any evidence.

 

[exGOPer]

Ad hominum. Not an argument.

That's not how ad hominem's work, I didn't reject your argument, I supplied an additional premise.

Well maybe the talking points are being put out by an actor(s) hostile to the election process of the United States...like some rogue moles deep in the CIA...or a secret society in the FBI.

You mean talking points like 'releasethememo'? Why the selective application of your theory of talking points?

Likewise, if the pundit on the Joe Scarewierdo show did not state a fact, and did not care about facts, how is what he said relevant?

The relevance may be the talking points he was following..

AGAIN, who CARES about him? He talked ad nauseam about Hillary's emails, so does that mean the email scandal was nothing?

I do care about facts, so the next question is, why are pundits on "ALL" major political shows functioning like bots repeating the same memes? And without offering any evidence?

The evidence is the RAW data which you refuse to look at!

https://dashboard.securingdemocracy.org

It appears you are blaming me (see ad hominum above) for asking the questions that a good reporter would/should ask, instead of swallowing the memes of pundit bots repeating the same talking points without any evidence.

And what are these talking points? When I linked to the research site last year, was there any talking point? The only reason you are supposedly upset about 'punditry' is because it makes your side looks bad. Why aren't you asking the same questions about 'releasethememo' for example? Isn't that a worse talking point considering there isn't even a memo that's released even though Rethugs acutally wrote them?

 

[LacesOut]

So there IS a list of talking points that "ALL" major political news sites (which you don't watch) are adhering to? And from those talking points, you can be sure what the pundit said on the Joe Scareharrow show?

Because Liberalism is a disease. It’s symptoms are Trump Derangement and moronic, inane observations and fabrications.

 

[exGOPer]

Because Liberalism is a disease. It’s symptoms are Trump Derangement and moronic, inane observations and fabrications.

More projection from dumb Cons

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/evolutionary-entertainment/201206/conservatism-mental-illness

 

[Arnie]

OPINION | Forget Don Jr.'s email — it's Hillary Clinton who 'colluded' with Russia

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...s-email-its-hillary-clinton-who-colluded-with

 

[exGOPer]

OPINION | Forget Don Jr.'s email — it's Hillary Clinton who 'colluded' with Russia

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...s-email-its-hillary-clinton-who-colluded-with

HILLARY ALSO HAD SEX WITH STORMY DANIELS AND IMPREGNATED MELANIA WHILE TRUMP WAS OUT TO PEE

This opinion has as much credibility as that piece of conservative intellectualism.