ABC Obtains FBI Agents’ Texts, ‘Secret Society’ Comment Appears to Have Been Made in Jest

[Good1]

You mean talking points like 'releasethememo'?

No, i mean talking points like,
A.) In response to the #releasethememo campaign (social media trend), tell the American public that the Russian Federation is running that campaign.
B.) With a straight face, tell the American public that this is a fact, which will explain why the pundits on ALL major political shows sound like they are speaking from the same talking points.

Why the selective application of your theory of talking points?

So you admit that the response to the #releasethememo campaign is coordinated by a set of talking points?

AGAIN, who CARES about him? He talked ad nauseam about Hillary's emails, so does that mean the email scandal was nothing?

I'm not talking about Joe Scarewierdo. I'm talking about the pundit on his show who was repeating the same talking points as ALL the major political shows.

The evidence is the RAW data which you refuse to look at!

https://dashboard.securingdemocracy.org

https://dashboard.securingdemocracy.org

The evidence (raw data, if you will) that the pundits are talking all from the same talking points is all the pundits on "all the major political shows" (according to you) are saying the same thing: the Russian Federation is running (you say "supporting") the #releasethememo campaign.

And what are these talking points?

See A. and B. above for examples of what the talking points might look like.

When I linked to the research site last year, was there any talking point?

I'm talking about talking points that were talked about yesterday. Not last year. The #releasethememo campaign started a few days ago. Where is the evidence the Russian Federation is running that campaign?

The only reason you are supposedly upset about 'punditry' is because it makes your side looks bad.

The only reason i'm asking the kind of questions a real reporter would/should ask is because i'm embarrassed for the Americans who are framed by all these pundits as pawns of the Russian Federation. It makes America look bad, to Americans, to Russians.

The reason you are upset that two Russians in their mom's basement are supporting the #releasethememo campaign (because the pundits make Russia look bad) is because their support helps American patriots make you look bad for trying to suppress the memo that exposes how Russia is being used by bad actors, bad pundits, and bad agents to undermine America's political process and steal an election, if possible.

Why aren't you asking the same questions about 'releasethememo' for example?

I don't have any questions about a campaign to get the American people to put pressure on their elected officials to uncover corruption within the agencies that it oversees.

Isn't that a worse talking point considering there isn't even a memo that's released even though Rethugs acutally wrote them?

Who/what are "Rethugs"? #releasethememo is a request, a campaign to get action on a request...not a talking point. It is not a statement of either opinion or fact. It is a call to action, so that there can be some evidence to answer several unanswered questions.

 

[Good1]

Getting back to the OP, sure, the FBI agents who, as lovers, were keeping a secret society (the two of them) apart from their spouses, JOKED about keeping a secret society apart from the agencies they were employed by.

Did their secret society look like Shriners riding around on tricycles? No. Just agency compadres getting together at a local pub for a beer, or getting into bed in a local hotel for a bang.

Joking about the appearance/existence/nature of their secret society does not mean they didn't meet, in secret, as a society, to further a conspiracy.

 

[exGOPer]

No, i mean talking points like,
A.) In response to the #releasethememo campaign (social media trend), tell the American public that the Russian Federation is running that campaign.
B.) With a straight face, tell the American public that this is a fact, which will explain why the pundits on ALL major political shows sound like they are speaking from the same talking points.

I thought you were upset about fallacies and now yourself use one.

Nobody said that Russians are RUNNING that campaign, what is said is that Russians have been AIDING this campaign like they have been doing with EVERYTHING else related to right wing outrage.

And IT IS A FACT, Russians have been for over a year, openly sided with right wingers, you can check their official channels like RT and Sputnik news to confirm this.

So you admit that the response to the #releasethememo campaign is coordinated by a set of talking points?.

I admit nothing, indicating to facts is not a talking point just because you want to ignore the facts.

I'm not talking about Joe Scarewierdo. I'm talking about the pundit on his show who was repeating the same talking points as ALL the major political shows.

You keep calling them talking points, you never talk about the facts itself.

Is there truth behind those 'talking points', if yes, then why does it matter if they are talking points? What's wrong with talking points if the subject matter is real? Was Hillary's email scandal fake news because of talking points used by the right?

The evidence (raw data, if you will) that the pundits are talking all from the same talking points is all the pundits on "all the major political shows" (according to you) are saying the same thing: the Russian Federation is running (you say "supporting") the #releasethememo campaign. .

One is your opinion, where is your compilation of the fact that these pundits were using the same talking points? Where is your study?

Here is my study on how Russian bots and Russian media are promoting the right wing campaign.

It's an undeniable fact

dashboard.securingdemocracy.org

See A. and B. above for examples of what the talking points might look like.

You can call any fact a talking point, means nothing in context.

I'm talking about talking points that were talked about yesterday. Not last year. The #releasethememo campaign started a few days ago. Where is the evidence the Russian Federation is running that campaign?

STRAWMAN ALERT!

They are AIDING right-wing propaganda, they are not RUNNING that campaign.

I saw others Cons trying to deceive using the same 'talking point', change the terms and then argue against it so they won't have to address uncomfortable facts.

The only reason i'm asking the kind of questions a real reporter would/should ask is because i'm embarrassed for the Americans who are framed by all these pundits as pawns of the Russian Federation. It makes America look bad, to Americans, to Russians.

The reason you are upset that two Russians in their mom's basement are supporting the #releasethememo campaign (because the pundits make Russia look bad) is because their support helps American patriots make you look bad for trying to suppress the memo that exposes how Russia is being used by bad actors, bad pundits, and bad agents to undermine America's political process and steal an election, if possible.

Pundits Pundits Pundits.

So I am sure you were upset that pundits couldn't stop yapping about Hillary's emails right? Do I have to link to all the clips Scarabrough talking about her emails as the biggest thing ever? Did it make Amerians look bad?

No? Why the hypocrisy then?

When Hannity went for two weeks promoting Seth Rich conspiracy while the right was releasing fake news after fake news, where you upset at the pundits then? Can you link me to some of your outrage pieces on the forum? No? Why not?

I don't have any questions about a campaign to get the American people to put pressure on their elected officials to uncover corruption within the agencies that it oversees.

That's ironic considering that your leader tried to fire guys investigating him and that members of his campaign have plead guilty to corruption and lying.

Who/what are "Rethugs"? #releasethememo is a request, a campaign to get action on a request...not a talking point. It is not a statement of either opinion or fact. It is a call to action, so that there can be some evidence to answer several unanswered questions.

LOL.

Let me get this straight.

Republicans draft a memo themselves.

Republicans then classify it.

Republicans then leak that there is a great memo but they can't release it because it's classified.

Republicans then start a PR campaign aided by Russians to force themselves to release that memo.

Don't you see the farce? Trump gave Russians highly classified info in the oval office and the argument was that he can declassify or do anything with classified info. But in this case, the Republican President cannot declassify a memo that Republicans themselves wrote?

As I keep asking, do you Cons think at all or you just get played everytime like puppets on a string by your media who do nothing but make claims and never present evidence.

When NYT got a bombshell story, they wrote a piece on it and released it which is what happened yesterday. They didn't start a campaign which was then aided by Mexicans about 'releasetheMueller'. By the way, Fox News confirmed the story themselves on air, even that retard Hammity had to eat crow.

 

[Good1]

I thought you were upset about fallacies and now yourself use one.

Nobody said that Russians are RUNNING that campaign, what is said is that Russians have been AIDING this campaign like they have been doing with EVERYTHING else related to right wing outrage.

And IT IS A FACT, Russians have been for over a year, openly sided with right wingers, you can check their official channels like RT and Sputnik news to confirm this.




I admit nothing, indicating to facts is not a talking point just because you want to ignore the facts.




You keep calling them talking points, you never talk about the facts itself.

Is there truth behind those 'talking points', if yes, then why does it matter if they are talking points? What's wrong with talking points if the subject matter is real? Was Hillary's email scandal fake news because of talking points used by the right?



One is your opinion, where is your compilation of the fact that these pundits were using the same talking points? Where is your study?

Here is my study on how Russian bots and Russian media are promoting the right wing campaign.

It's an undeniable fact

dashboard.securingdemocracy.org




You can call any fact a talking point, means nothing in context.




STRAWMAN ALERT!

They are AIDING right-wing propaganda, they are not RUNNING that campaign.

I saw others Cons trying to deceive using the same 'talking point', change the terms and then argue against it so they won't have to address uncomfortable facts.





Pundits Pundits Pundits.

So I am sure you were upset that pundits couldn't stop yapping about Hillary's emails right? Do I have to link to all the clips Scarabrough talking about her emails as the biggest thing ever? Did it make Amerians look bad?

No? Why the hypocrisy then?

When Hannity went for two weeks promoting Seth Rich conspiracy while the right was releasing fake news after fake news, where you upset at the pundits then? Can you link me to some of your outrage pieces on the forum? No? Why not?




That's ironic considering that your leader tried to fire guys investigating him and that members of his campaign have plead guilty to corruption and lying.





LOL.

Let me get this straight.

Republicans draft a memo themselves.

Republicans then classify it.

Republicans then leak that there is a great memo but they can't release it because it's classified.

Republicans then start a PR campaign aided by Russians to force themselves to release that memo.

Don't you see the farce? Trump gave Russians highly classified info in the oval office and the argument was that he can declassify or do anything with classified info. But in this case, the Republican President cannot declassify a memo that Republicans themselves wrote?

As I keep asking, do you Cons think at all or you just get played everytime like puppets on a string by your media who do nothing but make claims and never present evidence.

When NYT got a bombshell story, they wrote a piece on it and released it which is what happened yesterday. They didn't start a campaign which was then aided by Mexicans about 'releasetheMueller'. By the way, Fox News confirmed the story themselves on air, even that retard Hammity had to eat crow.

It would be unfair if you were sitting in a cubicle, PAID to argue all day on forums like this...as i am NOT paid to keep up with your word count. I wouldn't be surprised if your ever expanding word count was aided by artificial intelligence (a bot).

I think that is the real difference between paid pundits, and concerned citizens.

Not just concerned citizens of American, but also concerned citizens of Russia.

It would be easy to believe there are more than a few Russian citizens who fear what might happen if the soft coup, going on in American right now, succeeded, and gave them Nuclear Rodham Clinton, who, distracting the public from the coup, would proceed to launch a hot war against the State (Russian Federation) that she says stole the election from her in the first place.

Based on fears like that, it's possible some Russians are re-tweeting the #releasethememo hash tag.

How is this "news" that needs to be emphasized by Joe Scatborough's pundits, as if no one else but "the Russian Federation" was contributing to the #releasethememo campaign?

What percentage of contributors of that campaign make that campaign something that is officially co-opted by "the Russian Federation"?

If it's not co-opted by "the Russian Federation", why mention it?

Maybe there are a few citizens of Libya (who weren't blown up by team Hussein-Hillary) who are also contributing (supporting) that campaign.

Why not say it's being run by Libyans?

 

[exGOPer]

It would be unfair if you were sitting in a cubicle, PAID to argue all day on forums like this...as i am NOT paid to keep up with your word count. I wouldn't be surprised if your ever expanding word count was aided by artificial intelligence (a bot).

I think that is the real difference between paid pundits, and concerned citizens.

Not just concerned citizens of American, but also concerned citizens of Russia.

It would be easy to believe there are more than a few Russian citizens who fear what might happen if the soft coup, going on in American right now, succeeded, and gave them Nuclear Rodham Clinton, who, distracting the public from the coup, would proceed to launch a hot war against the State (Russian Federation) that she says stole the election from her in the first place.

Based on fears like that, it's possible some Russians are re-tweeting the #releasethememo hash tag.

How is this "news" that needs to be emphasized by Joe Scatborough's pundits, as if no one else but "the Russian Federation" was contributing to the #releasethememo campaign?

What percentage of contributors of that campaign make that campaign something that is officially co-opted by "the Russian Federation"?

If it's not co-opted by "the Russian Federation", why mention it?

Maybe there are a few citizens of Libya (who weren't blown up by team Hussein-Hillary) who are also contributing (supporting) that campaign.

Why not say it's being run by Libyans?

Ah yes, everytime a conservative gets in a logical bind, out comes the 'shill' and 'troll' arguments.

As for 'Russian citizens', these are BOTS, these are GOVERNMENT FUNDED sources that don't allow DISSENT in their home country but they are worried about America's democracy?

You are inventing a narrative to suit your metanarrative.

This 'memo' campaign (if you bothered to look) was their biggest push since the Seth Rich farce, which is why it's important.

Libya? Hussein Hillary? You do know that Trump SUPPORTED those Libyan actions right? But that's besides the point, do you have ANY evidence that the Libyan government is running a propaganda campaign.

Jesus Christ, are all of you Cons just plain dishonest? WHATABOUT and INSINUATING is all you guys do all the time. Never take responsibility for anything, it's everyone else's fault that they get caught doing shady shit.

 

[LacesOut]

More projection from dumb Cons

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/evolutionary-entertainment/201206/conservatism-mental-illness

seems legit..
any other Evolutionary Entertainers you can link?

 

[Good1]

Ah yes, everytime a conservative gets in a logical bind, out comes the 'shill' and 'troll' arguments.

As for 'Russian citizens', these are BOTS, these are GOVERNMENT FUNDED sources that don't allow DISSENT in their home country but they are worried about America's democracy?

You are inventing a narrative to suit your metanarrative.

This 'memo' campaign (if you bothered to look) was their biggest push since the Seth Rich farce, which is why it's important.

Libya? Hussein Hillary? You do know that Trump SUPPORTED those Libyan actions right? But that's besides the point, do you have ANY evidence that the Libyan government is running a propaganda campaign.

Jesus Christ, are all of you Cons just plain dishonest? WHATABOUT and INSINUATING is all you guys do all the time. Never take responsibility for anything, it's everyone else's fault that they get caught doing shady shit.

No not a logical bind, a time bind. At some point it COSTS me to try to keep up with your word count, a count that looks more and more like it is supported by PAYMENT.

So that would be unfair. Are you saying you are not sitting in a cubicle getting paid to argue all day?

Now, Russians who look at what happened to Libya thanks to team Huisein-Hillary, and see the slave trade going on their now, might be prompted to retweet #releasethememo, out of fear that if the soft coup in America succeeds to supplant Trump with the Wicked Witch from the West, it might have adverse effects on the Russian nation, which was used an as excuse to overthrow the American President.

I would remind you that Twitter is a relatively open global forum where anyone from any nation can participate. If 5% of the #releasethememo campaign is supported by Russians, why is that worth mentioning on national TV by someone posing as a pundit?

 

[exGOPer]

No not a logical bind, a time bind. At some point it COSTS me to try to keep up with your word count, a count that looks more and more like it is supported by PAYMENT.

So that would be unfair. Are you saying you are not sitting in a cubicle getting paid to argue all day?

Now, Russians who look at what happened to Libya thanks to team Huisein-Hillary, and see the slave trade going on their now, might be prompted to retweet #releasethememo, out of fear that if the soft coup in America succeeds to supplant Trump with the Wicked Witch from the West, it might have adverse effects on the Russian nation, which was used an as excuse to overthrow the American President.

I would remind you that Twitter is a relatively open global forum where anyone from any nation can participate. If 5% of the #releasethememo campaign is supported by Russians, why is that worth mentioning on national TV by someone posing as a pundit?

So Libya was Obama and Hillary's fault now? Can you even bother to read up the wiki on what happened there and please save me the bullshit talking points about 'slave trade' like you give a shit.

And who said it was 5%? See this is the problem, you are willing to perfectly repeat all the right wing talking points so you assume every other counter argument is a left wing talking point.

There is no point arguing anymore, you guys are the eternal victims and anybody who counter argues using facts is the criminal for bringing up facts into your world.

 

[exGOPer]

seems legit..
any other Evolutionary Entertainers you can link?

Of course evolution is a joke, look what it has done to your brain.

 

[jem]

I show you things like this and links to articles which explain how hillary and obama fucked up syria and armed moderates who became Isis and were al queda and a few days later you act you never read them.

She is who fucked up libya. She armed terrorists. She destablized libya and unleashed a flow of immigrants... and yes... there is now a slave trade.

She took credit for taking out Ghadaffi.


She looks all happy she took someone's life here. She is so detached from reality. She thinks she has a big win as she destablizes a country and a region.
she secrewed up everything she was involved in. she could not even name one accomplishment she had at the state department.
She had no accomplishments in the Senate which I recall.
She may be the world's most dangerous decision maker.

So Libya was Obama and Hillary's fault now? Can you even bother to read up the wiki on what happened there and please save me the bullshit talking points about 'slave trade' like you give a shit.

And who said it was 5%? See this is the problem, you are willing to perfectly repeat all the right wing talking points so you assume every other counter argument is a left wing talking point.

There is no point arguing anymore, you guys are the eternal victims and anybody who counter argues using facts is the criminal for bringing up facts into your world.