I thought we had established antibodies isn't the best metric for acquired immunity, just one of the few available?
FWIW, I don't believe the science definitively supports your assertion either. I've seen reputable studies backing both hypothesis (Tony's and yours).
Ideally, government should've taken the wait and see approach on the healed. Since 40% of the population is in a cult of personality, I can see why they would downplay natural immunity for fear of said cultists having bug chasing parties in lieu of vaccination, risking overloading our hospitals, plus possibly of variants developing
And let's discuss -- once again -- in-depth why Covid vaccines are much better than "natural immunity". It's time to drive the points home.
No, your antibodies are not better than vaccination: An explainer
Infection does offer some immune protection—but it's unreliable compared with vaccines.
https://arstechnica.com/science/202...tion-why-everyone-should-get-a-covid-19-shot/
In one study Ars reported on back in June of last year, researchers looking at SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in people who had recovered found that the difference between the highest and lowest levels varied by a factor of over 1,000. The researchers saw even more variability when they looked at neutralizing antibodies—those known to bind to the virus and prevent it from infecting cells. Neutralizing antibody levels in recovered people varied over a range of 40,000-fold, and up to 20 percent of people didn't have any detectable level of neutralizing antibody.
Let's also read the large bolded print below... Nearly 40% of people don't have antibody protection which lasts 6 months to stop reinfection with Covid.
From the article:
From the analysis, the researchers created five categories based on how long antibodies lasted in an individual.
The first category, called the "negative" group, included the individuals who never developed detectable neutralizing antibodies. This group comprised 11.6% of participants.
Comprising 26.8% of patients, the second group is called the "rapid waning" group and showed varying early levels of antibodies that waned quickly. The third category comprised 29% of participants and was called the "slow waning" group as these patients tested positive for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 for up to half a year.
The fourth group, called the "persistent" group, comprised 31.7% of patients and showed little change in their antibody levels up to 180 days. The last group, or the "delayed response" group, covered only 1.8% of subjects and included those who showed a marked rise in neutralizing antibodies during late convalescence.
Individual COVID-19 Antibodies Could Last Days To Decades, Scientists Find
https://www.ibtimes.com/individual-...uld-last-days-decades-scientists-find-3168292
Last edited: