US used sabotage to protect Ukraine.
None of this proxy war would have happened under Trump.
Trump would have congratulated Putin for the smart move of a genocide on the people in Ukraine, and asked him if he needs anything.
US used sabotage to protect Ukraine.
None of this proxy war would have happened under Trump.
Because it wouldn't be the first time Putin orchestrated a false-flag-type operation, to gain advantage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_apartment_bombings
https://www.businessinsider.com/how...t-bombings-led-to-putins-rise-to-power-2018-3
...He quickly became the most popular politician in Russia, even though before the apartment bombings, he was believed to have had no chance to succeed Yeltsin as president.I don't know how old you are, I remember reading the news back then. Putin had already been chosen by Yeltsin as acting prime minister and a successor to become the president before the bombings. False Flag or not, no one really knows.
...He quickly became the most popular politician in Russia, even though before the apartment bombings, he was believed to have had no chance to succeed Yeltsin as president.
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/putins-way/transcript/
https://www.cia.gov/static/e530e07b076ddbdf52c095ff7b58ad2f/Mr-Putin.pdf
The dots are close enough to connect given Putin's nature and past deeds.
And how does the US profit from the explosion of an already abandoned gas pipeline? Why would the US actually warn Germany in advance that sabotage of this pipeline is coming? Why would the US attack NATO partners and the EU in times when we need to stand together?
The US is probably the last to have any reason at all. Well, maybe the Bermuda Islands have even fewer motives. Not sure about that though.
But as I said, it doesn't make much of a difference what you think anyway, because everyone involved knows already that it's 0% US and 100% Russia.
How do I phrase it, so you can understand it? There was NO gas coming to Germany from Russia. Russia didn't deliver ANY gas at all to Germany anymore. NS 1+2 were completely dead. Zero output. And Germany doesn't have even a single LNG terminal. The amount of gas coming from US to Germany is zero as well.
And yet, the German gas tanks are at 91% full and still filling up each and every day. Because Norway raised their gas production substantially. That's it. End of story.
If there would be some crazy US conspiracy going on to take over the gas market in Europe, they should have bombed the pipeline from Norway. There was no gas from Russia. Pretty stupid, isn't it?
Trump would have congratulated Putin for the smart move of a genocide on the people in Ukraine, and asked him if he needs anything.
You can google the timeline yourself, back before the internet bubble.
You don't know what you are talking about, John. As of this month Germany is arranging for a 5th floating LNG terminal to go online. Your claim is incorrect. Then there was still gas streaming through the pipelines, though a drop in the bucket. Your claim of nil going through is also factually incorrect. Then in case you know anything about the European natural resource infrastructure, lng lines in Germany and all of Europe are well interconnected to 5 major hubs. Spain has a large lng terminal but its routes to France are bottlenecked. Up to earlier this year the number one importer of lng into Europe was and still is the US, then Qatar, then Russia. Though the majority came in through the pipelines. The pipelines transported a multiple of gas into Europe than any lng terminal, even the one in corpus Christi could ever produce.