Search results

Not true, I am not trying to convince myself more than anyone else, its just that the subject has been brought up. I looked for the same answers just like anyone else, and made the effort to find out for myself the scientific engineering version (using my brain), and, guess what, I found it...

1. Thanks turok, so you have proved that it could never have been an explosives demo job Hello Jesse, that throws out your sharp charge theory 2. The Towers imploded at the speed of "gravity" because there was a catastrophic failure of the structure owing to the altering of the...

Not so positive today

You may as well fly in a jet full of fuel at 400mph to change the stress/strain characteristics of the materials at the impact zone. it is likely that where the impact occurred, the steel beams and concrete were severely damaged if not re-aligned or severed and why leave the lower floors...

This had to occur in 10 seconds for the implosion of the Towers, so 110 floors say, that's less than 0.1 second per floor, so it had to be simultaneous. And GUESS they would have found the remains/debris of the controlled demo after the implosion. no evidence yet of any controlled...

1. The logistics required for this were not present prior to 9/11. (that has been proven, and you don't need to be a demo contractor to figure that one out). 2. for a demo implosion to be successful, the lower floors have to be rigged, and there was no evidence of this in the basement or the...

Yes I know it's a GAS law, but, the point is that Pressure is proportional to Temperature, and Volume is proportional to Temperature. 1. The Volume of metal increases with increasing Temperature, and in a Controlled environment, an increase in temperature causes an increase in pressure, that...

You have to consider the fact that the metal beams in a building framework are under an applied stress over time From Charles', Henry's and Boyles law we get PV=nRT So the beams are in a contained volume (V) over a period of time with increasing temperature (T), that means that the...

this is completely duplicitous, you first ask the question of wtc1 and wtc2 and then apply the answer to wtc7, this is just silly some of us can read fact 1 you cannot disprove the "creep of metals" scientific answer because it is correct fact 2 you cannot disprove gravity, it...

When a team works on a project it is called team work we all have our own designated responsibilities A project such as a simple demolition to the layman, can have huge logistic implications, and it is unlikely that all individuals will be in the know of every tiny aspect related to a project...

that' why you CP'ers are no better than the Muslim Radicals, because you are ideologically driven 1. you enter into a discussion, then turn it into an arguement when you realise that your point has a scientific answer to it 2. you then turn the discussion into an arguement with your "shoot...

The answer is yes, if you ever heated metal, you know it expands. So the steel beam framework is set in place and bolted to an exact length, once the superheating started to occur from the burning jet fuel, the beams would have buckled from expansion. 1. For the vertical beams, they would...

another conclusion 1. assuming dynamite is used for the explosives, it would have to be wired up, this would have to have occurred throughout the floors. There were thousands of people there, someone would have seen the wiring and reported it. 2. the people in the Towers had communication...

conclusion 1. 5p hasn't given the critical path of thermate 2. science does not see a political boundary, it is not here to score political points or to do what 5p is implying (obviously doesn't understand what science means) 3. the collapse has been attributed to "Creep of Metals" i.e...

I meant for wtc7. The foundations for wtc1 and wtc2 were possibly bedrock, and a lot of jacking. The people who went up the North Tower were NYFD, and (1) they had to, because that was their job, also (2) believe (correct me if I am wrong), that some wanted to do so despite being told...

This thread is not about ego either

so you think this wasn't a geotechnical assessment?

This doesn't answer the question of critical path, only that it was there and its property.

No one thought that the Towers would implode, because no one knew about how "Creep of Metals" would affect the Towers' structure. So if it was an inside job, there is no way that wtc7 could have been a demo job, because no one thought it was possible to bring the Towers down that is why the...

From what TM has written, there was no indication that implied "planes hit wtc7," what was written in his quote was "when the planes hit." You added wtc7 to that sentence. So, yeah, why not blow up wtc7 at the same time as the planes hit the other towers?