So let me ask you this:Quote from gwb-trading:
In this case and many others it certainly is. Otherwise we would have armed people walking around, assaulting a victim, and then pulling out a gun & shooting the victim when the victim defended themselves.... then claiming it was self-defense.
The self-defense claim only holds when the other party starts the physical confrontation assaulting the gun owner.
1) what specific condition must be met to establish who started a fight?
