Zimmerman's bail set at $1M in Trayvon Martin case

Quote from trendlover:

You are not thinking who is really the person angry. Trayvon is walking home only. He have no gun, no "burglar tool" He is talking on the phone with his girlfriend before he die. He is not angry in that night. He is not want to steal from the community. He is only walking home with no gun and no burglary tool. But George Zimmerman is angry. He tell the 911 "These asshole always get away" "Fucking goons" George Zimmerman imagine Trayvon is criminal. He is angry and he judge with no proof. This is WRONG.

+1
 
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:



Martin was hardly a "good kid."


Martin doesn't have 1 accusation of violence against another human being.



Zimmerman ...



Accused of assaulting a law enforcement officer

Accused of being fired from a job for being overly aggressive with customers

Accused (formal complaint filed with company)of bullying and harassing a co worker at another job

Accused of assaulting a female

Accused of sexually molesting another female






http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/zimmerman-witness-sexual-molestation-160900334.html


A family friend of George Zimmerman told investigators he sexually molested her on and off for nearly a decade, newly released audio tapes in the Trayvon Martin shooting case reveal.

Zimmerman family friend claims he molested her, new audio tapes reveal
 
Quote from TGregg:

Hopefully that'll simplify it for you. Suppose that post trial we see that the prosecutions evidence was terrible (as in Duke Lacrosse). I do not mean questionable, I do not mean maybe, I mean "Holy #@*& only a retard would bring this case!" Would you (trefoil) support charges against the various prosecutors in this hypothetical situation?

Quote from trefoil:

Well obviously. That's a pretty silly hypothetical.

Really? Would you have called it a silly hypothetical during the Duke Lacrosse case? I suspect not.
 
Quote from TGregg:

Really? Would you have called it a silly hypothetical during the Duke Lacrosse case? I suspect not.

Hypothetical piled on top of hypothetical.
The Duke case fell apart before the trial. Given the amount of attention this one has gotten, you can be sure if there were that kind of evidence of prosecutorial misconduct, given the enormous funding of the right-wing side of the media these days (Fox, News Corp in general, NewsMax, The Weekly Standard, The National Review, etc.), that would have come to light already.
Rich folks do tend to be over on the right, ya know? And last I checked they were not shy about using their money to advance their point of view re gun rights and all that.
So somehow I don't think the fact nothing like that has been advanced yet is for lack of no one trying.
Do try to stay on this planet. It's the only one we have.

Let's see what happens at trial.
 
Quote from trefoil:

Hypothetical piled on top of hypothetical.
The Duke case fell apart before the trial. Given the amount of attention this one has gotten, you can be sure if there were that kind of evidence of prosecutorial misconduct, given the enormous funding of the right-wing side of the media these days (Fox, News Corp in general, NewsMax, The Weekly Standard, The National Review, etc.), that would have come to light already.
Rich folks do tend to be over on the right, ya know?

Wow. And it was so different during the Duke Lacrosse case. Don't forget it took firing the DA to change course.

Wow. One's mind boggles at the misconceptions, hyperbole, and straight up logical fallicies the left offers.

Yet, you never answered my original question, too hard for you perhaps?

Suppose that post trial we see that the prosecutions evidence was terrible (as in Duke Lacrosse). I do not mean questionable, I do not mean maybe, I mean "Holy #@*& only a retard would bring this case!" Would you (trefoil) support charges against the various prosecutors in this hypothetical situation?
 
Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Martin doesn't have 1 accusation of violence against another human being.



Zimmerman ...



Accused of assaulting a law enforcement officer

Accused of being fired from a job for being overly aggressive with customers

Accused (formal complaint filed with company)of bullying and harassing a co worker at another job

Accused of assaulting a female

Accused of sexually molesting another female






http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/zimmerman-witness-sexual-molestation-160900334.html


A family friend of George Zimmerman told investigators he sexually molested her on and off for nearly a decade, newly released audio tapes in the Trayvon Martin shooting case reveal.

Zimmerman family friend claims he molested her, new audio tapes reveal

yep and just 100 yrs ago the moon was made of cheese.

Other than character assassination what has this got to do with lil trey earning a Darwin award?
 
They prove Jorge Zimmerman is angry and say "These assholes always get away "Fucking goons" They prove George Zimmerman follow Trayvon. They prove George Zimmerman follow Trayvon and he have gun. They prove Trayvon is walking there because he stay with his father and is walking home. They prove Trayvon have no gun, no burglary tool, is not criminal. They prove Trayvon only talking on the phone with his girlfriend and is no trying to steal. They prove George Zimmerman never tell the 911 he SEE crime from Travyon.
 
Quote from TGregg:

Suppose that post trial we see that the prosecutions evidence was terrible (as in Duke Lacrosse). I do not mean questionable, I do not mean maybe, I mean "Holy #@*& only a retard would bring this case!" Would you (trefoil) support charges against the various prosecutors in this hypothetical situation?

Or anyone from the left? Anyone at all? Are the left so bereft of race blindness that they cannot see beyond the color of one's skin?

Anyone? Any liberals out there that are color blind?

Any? Any at all?
 
Quote from TGregg:

Wow. And it was so different during the Duke Lacrosse case. Don't forget it took firing the DA to change course.

Wow. One's mind boggles at the misconceptions, hyperbole, and straight up logical fallicies the left offers.

Yet, you never answered my original question, too hard for you perhaps?

Suppose that post trial we see that the prosecutions evidence was terrible (as in Duke Lacrosse). I do not mean questionable, I do not mean maybe, I mean "Holy #@*& only a retard would bring this case!" Would you (trefoil) support charges against the various prosecutors in this hypothetical situation?

Is your reading comprehension that bad or are you just stupid?
 
Quote from TGregg:

Wow. And it was so different during the Duke Lacrosse case. Don't forget it took firing the DA to change course.

Wow. One's mind boggles at the misconceptions, hyperbole, and straight up logical fallicies the left offers.

Yet, you never answered my original question, too hard for you perhaps?

Suppose that post trial we see that the prosecutions evidence was terrible (as in Duke Lacrosse). I do not mean questionable, I do not mean maybe, I mean "Holy #@*& only a retard would bring this case!" Would you (trefoil) support charges against the various prosecutors in this hypothetical situation?

Is your reading comprehension that bad or are you just stupid?
Quote from trefoil:


Curious that. Libtards cannot help but blindly attack when their arguments fail. Sucks to be them. We feel for you, we really do. It must suck to have a position that has no valid arguments, no valid philosophy. So allow me to persevere. Are you saying that you would support charges against the prosecuting attorneys should they be seriously afoul of the law?
.

It is a straight up yes or no answer, but the left cannot be pinned down upon such a thing. When you are a liberal, there is no right or wrong, no up and down. Everything is relative. Everything depends on other things. Right or wrong depends on race. Taxes depend on wealth. Political power depends on party. Liberals divide us to conquer us!

So Yes or No?! I realize you cannot answer.
 
Back
Top