There is nothing I would disagree here. Honesty -- an absolute foundation!
Please allow me to give you an example of what I find in your analysis that I don't find very often even in very accomplished traders who write here. I don't mean this as a way of offending other accomplished traders here in ET, but as an example of why I enjoy reading your analysis. This is a counter-example to make my point:
Take Handle123's post here today: He commends Yukoner for doing a great job of not looking at PnL; He also commends Yukoner for pulling out of the hole he was in.
In my analysis, these two points are not compatible: If we ask someone not to be concerned about PnL then, we should not commend them for pulling out of the hole. But, the truth is that we are concerned about PnL, and pulling out of the hole is important. So, this disconnect can be only addressed if one acknowledges that PnL is important to consider. But the question is when does one consider PnL? We are all in agreement that PnL should not be looked at during a trade; so, it follows that PnL has to be looked at after the trade is over. However, one cannot wait for post-market analysis to view PnL for one has to be concerned about daily loss limits. This was precisely Yukoner's concern and issue (although not framed this way).
In many of your analysis, I don't find these types of inconsistencies, and hence my respect for your opinion over other successful traders.
To Handle123: I sincerely apologize calling your post out. Every post of yours tells me that you are a very successful trader. I do not mean to undermine you in anyway, but was just making an analysis of your argument. If I have over-stepped my boundary, I am sincerely sorry. Tell me so, and I will delete this post.
Regards,
Monoid.
You know what is the greatest thing about getting older? You just don't give a shit what anyone says about you whether good or bad, I am closer to end of life than the beginning, you look at life differently, so don't apologize to me ever. You have an opinion, give it.
But I disagree in your assessment of "these two points are not compatible", if you have read from " Yukoner" beginnings, getting to breakeven on the day is a change in his rules, has nothing to do with making money, it is a rule of stop trading cause of breakeven. In his past he would continue to trade and get close to $1000 loss days after coming back from down on the day. I never said to not keep a running total of losing trades. Yes one might think I am talking about money, but I am not. I am talking about putting on the trades with no regard of P/L and other is not overtrading. Humans don't do well on prolonged stresses, we tire easier. If he had continued and ended on the day with bigger profit, I would have said that wasn't a good play, Yukoner has times of being up well twice and ended three times in hole. If you up well, need to place money stop on account or trade less lots so your base grows each day.
When you get to the point of not losing most days, accounts go up not matter how much you made.
