YouTube bans Alex Jones

Does anyone know about this news regarding new facist regulations on big tech? Is this from the onion or can anyone verify it?

https://www.axios.com/mark-warner-g...per-023d4a52-2b25-4e44-a87c-945e73c637fa.html

https://www.axios.com/mark-warner-g...per-023d4a52-2b25-4e44-a87c-945e73c637fa.html

You need someone to read it for you and tell you what is in it?

You are not ashamed asking people to do that? Shall well cut your meat for you later?

Mind you media literacy classes might be a good idea for boomers. They do seem a bit lost.
 
You need someone to read it for you and tell you what is in it?

You are not ashamed asking people to do that? Shall well cut your meat for you later?

Mind you medial literacy classes might be a good idea for boomers.
Yes, please. Are we having Salisbury steak again?

TIA
 
You need someone to read it for you and tell you what is in it?

You are not ashamed asking people to do that? Shall well cut your meat for you later?

Mind you media literacy classes might be a good idea for boomers. They do seem a bit lost.
Here you go! I just didn't want to throw chum in the water and watch some disgusting libtard orgy that celebrates fascist policies.

The allegedly leaked memo is posted at the previously posted link.

From the article:

In a policy paper obtained by Axios, Sen. Mark Warner's office laid out 20 different paths to address problems posed by Big Tech platforms — ranging from putting a price on individual users' data to funding media literacy programs.

Why it matters: The paper — prepared by Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner’s staff and circulated in tech policy circles in recent weeks — is a window t0 the options available to U.S. policymakers concerned about disinformation and privacy. Enacting any of these plans is a long shot in the near-term, but a shift in party control of Congress come November could give them more momentum.

The policy paper divides the different proposals along three lines:

  1. Combating disinformation,
  2. Protecting user privacy,
  3. Promoting competition in the tech space.
 
I think a few antifa channels got pulled as well, just not reported in my op.

I don't think so, based on the news feed. Plus, Youtube would have said so in order to give the appearance of a balanced view. But I suppose it is possible.
 
Alex Jones doesn't speak for me, and in fact I am on record many times on this site condemning Infowars and refusing to go to that site.

This does not, however, mean I believe he should be banned from Youtube. If Youtube had cleaned house and removed folks on the left and the right, I'd be inclined to at least accept impartiality. But, of course, they did not, and are not.

I don't think they banned Jones because he's on the right. They probably banned him because of his conspiracy "theories" and call for violence. It doesn't have to be tit for tat (right vs left). It can be truth vs lies. It just so happens that there are many high profile alt-righters who call for violence and spew outright lies to support their point. When the social media networks ban Russian trolls (the real ones) they are attacking all of them - not just the right leaning ones, but it just happens that most are right leaning.

What I find scary is that reasonable people equate Alex Jones as a right leaning person and not just a fringe lunatic who damages our actual discourse. If the case is that all right wing people view him as on "their side," then maybe (to take a suggestion from a right wing politician who was anti-Muslim) the right should do more to police their own.
 
I don't think they banned Jones because he's on the right. They probably banned him because of his conspiracy "theories" and call for violence. It doesn't have to be tit for tat (right vs left). It can be truth vs lies. It just so happens that there are many high profile alt-righters who call for violence and spew outright lies to support their point. When the social media networks ban Russian trolls (the real ones) they are attacking all of them - not just the right leaning ones, but it just happens that most are right leaning.

What I find scary is that reasonable people equate Alex Jones as a right leaning person and not just a fringe lunatic who damages our actual discourse. If the case is that all right wing people view him as on "their side," then maybe (to take a suggestion from a right wing politician who was anti-Muslim) the right should do more to police their own.

They banned him because they think he is extreme right. And he is.
 
Back
Top