Quote from newwurldmn:
Trading as a career is not about performance. It's about confidence. The person handing you money to trade for them must have confidence that you will steward their capital appropriately.
Returns are only one facet of building this confidence. An 18 year old highschool dropout who claims to make 15%/year risking 1% per trade doesn't inspire confidence.
15% monthly returns are likely unsustainable; lack of education means you probably don't have the critical reasoning skills to understand risk management, and being 18 implies you lack the maturity to understand what you are doing.
Thank your for taking the time to respond to my thread. I appreciate it.
It seems there are a lot of people who are skeptical, and choose to treat me as any other 18 year old, which is completely understandable and anticipated.
Now, regarding your criticism regarding my returns and money/risk management.
I fail to see how 15% a month is unstable. I do not put limitations on my profits. The only limitations I have are those that the market sets forth.
In other words, I only take valid setups (in relation to my strategy), and never go "searching" for a trade, when it is not there. If the market does not give me a valid, high probability setup for me to trade, then it is simple, I will NOT trade.
If, however, the market presents me with valid, high probability setups, I will take them. It is just that simple.
CAPITAL PRESERVATION IS #1.
Regarding my risk and money management.
I only risk 1% of my capital per trade. You will begin to understand why I do this momentarily.
I only take high probability setups. I have a very good win rate. I do not know the exact %, but it has been good enough to not give me any significant DD, beyond a 3-4%, and that is rare.
My Reward:risk for every trade must be at least 3:1, or I will not take it.
It is not uncommon for me to have trades that produce 10:1 Reward:risk ratio.
With this kind of R:R, hit rate, and risk per trade, the chances of going bust are extremely low, as long as psychology stays in check. The only way I can go bust is if I fail psychologically, which Is something I believe I continue to control very well.
I am confident in my proven statistical edge, and that is why, regardless of a few losing trades here and there, I do not care. In the end, I will end up positive. Mark Douglas (Author of "Trading in the Zone") explains this concept extremely well. In fact, better than anyone else I have ever witnessed.
This is a psychological game. Its as simple as that.