After reading this thread, I had a vision that FMD is just chilling, knowing that the feds will step into the fray and become the insurer of last resort if no one else does. FMD publicly state "oh, gee, things are so bad. We hope someone helps these stressed out students and their families." In the meantime, they refuse a 1 billion warehouse facility from Goldman Sachs, because they have no need for it.
There is a front page article in the New York Times today about how families are already panicking, in April, because they don't know how they'll pay for their kids' college tuition in September this year.
Read that article.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/12/business/12loan.html?em&ex=1208145600&en=2e1077c9c3936876&ei=5087
It puts the business model and the political pressures on the same canvass, and gives me a lot of reassurance that this is a market failure that government will correct, if they have to.
And besides, what's the worst risk even if the feds replace TERI or other insurers? They'll see 4-7% of loans go bad? So what. That's probably less than the default rate on auto or consumer loans, and they'll still make money off the 96% to 93% of loans that perform.
That risk is so negligible for the government that it doesn't even register on the radar. It's not a risk at all, statistically speaking. It's another means of playing the hero role and coming to the rescue. Families actually WANT the government to step in.
Government always wants to be the hero. Unlike how the Bear Stearns 'rescue' made the Federal Reserve and Bernanke look, this will make Congress look like superheroes. Everyone from little Johnny, to Ma and Pa, and even the holy grail of real politik, Grandma and Grandpa, will write letters of thanks to their superhero Congressmen/women and Senators, because the fam can afford to ship Johnny or Susie away to college.