Here is a question that I have asked on the forum every six months for the last several years which gets ignored ....but...one of these days the tide will turn and the powers that be will dig deeper.
Alvin Bragg's predecessor was of course Cyrus Vance.
One day, out of the blue, when a New York prosecution of Epstein was not even active, Cyrus Vance showed up in Manhattan District Court and asked the judge to lower Epstein's sex offender classification. It was not a routine matter, or at least the judge did not treat it that way and smelled something rotten and told him to get the fuck out.
So the question remains: For what reason would the Manhattan District Attorney- appear personally and not through an assistant DA- to argue a low level matter like that. And how and for what reason did he feel that he owed Epstein that "favor."
I don't keep up with the monthly court actions to release more and more of Epstein's black book stuff. Some is released, some gets redacted, some gets redacted and then released after court review. Not sure where we are with all of that. My answer might still be coming. Or not. Cyrus Vance's name may appear in documents that name other known dems which the powers that be are fully committed to protecting, so Vance may get protection indirectly that way. Or not.
Lawmakers ask Tish James to investigate Cy Vance over Epstein case
https://nypost.com/2019/07/13/lawmakers-ask-tish-james-to-investigate-cy-vance-over-epstein-case/