WTF is the deal with these flash mobs?

Quote from LEAPup:

Lol! A VERY naive statement as you don't know what you say. You've never been in a life/death situation, and it shows. A firearm is NEVER, EVER to be used to "scare" a bad guy away!!! You never point a firearm at anything you don't plan to shoot.

And the point in carrying a concealed weapon is the element of surprise. Someone is going to mug you, beat your brains out, etc., you first try to avoid the situation. If you cannot, you draw the pistol or revolver, acquire a good sight picture, and squeeze the trigger until the threat has been stopped.

Btw shortie, did you know that 54 million people were exterminated in the 1900's AFTER they were disarmed by their governments? If I could post a powerpoint that I received from a College Professor (surprising huh), it will help you understand.

I don't know what else it's going to take to point out to you that you're wasting your time arguing this stuff. I'm starting to feel frustrated, and I don't frustrate easy. Are you really for real with this stuff, or do you have too much time on your hands?
More...

Shortie has no intention of having a serious conversation so take that with a grain of salt. But I do have a question for you. If I had a gun and was in a life or death situation I think I would be more inclined to go for a flesh wound vs trying to kill them but you obviously have an opinion on this. Are you saying it's too dangerous to just try to wound the attacker? When you say the intent is to kill, not harm. Is there a reason for this?
 
Quote from Maverick74:

Shortie has no intention of having a serious conversation so take that with a grain of salt. But I do have a question for you. If I had a gun and was in a life or death situation I think I would be more inclined to go for a flesh wound vs trying to kill them but you obviously have an opinion on this. Are you saying it's too dangerous to just try to wound the attacker? When you say the intent is to kill, not harm. Is there a reason for this?
More...

Yes, I can't respond to shortie's stuff anymore. It's giving me a headache.

And NO, you never go for a flesh wound. You shoot for center of mass. And by center of mass, that's the largest part of this person that is in your sight picture during an attack.

90% of the time, that means from the belt line to the neck line. i.e., the torso.

And trust me, you don't want to kill anyone as a result of a shooting. All you're doing is shooting to stop the threat. You shoot until the threat has ended. Whether they live or not, you won't have any control over that.
 
Quote from LEAPup:

Yes, I can't respond to shortie's stuff anymore. It's giving me a headache.

And NO, you never go for a flesh wound. You shoot for center of mass. And by center of mass, that's the largest part of this person that is in your sight picture during an attack.

90% of the time, that means from the belt line to the neck line. i.e., the torso.

And trust me, you don't want to kill anyone as a result of a shooting. All you're doing is shooting to stop the threat. You shoot until the threat has ended. Whether they live or not, you won't have any control over that.
More...

Are you saying that because most people will be a bad shot in that situation and you don't want to take the chance of missing or because if I just injure the attacker they will still come after me?
 
if the attacker comes to you with a knife and you shoot him dead, will you have hard time in court justifying your action? maybe not, but i am sure there are plenty of cases where the attacker ended up to be the victim in court's eyes.
 
Quote from shortie:

the government can killed the armed people just as efficiently. you don't really believe that if THEY come to your door saying that you violated such and such law you will shoot your way out, do you?
More...

I just can't let this one go. Did you know that Japanese Commanders admitted during their surrender in WWII said, WE DIDN'T INVADE THE US AS WE KNEW THE CIVILLIANS HAD GUNS, AND A MISSION LIKE THAT WOULD HAVE FAILED.

And did you know that the 2nd Amendment makes the rest possible? i.e., armed citizens CAN keep the government in check if they decide to do so.

Good God! Are you in a mental lockup or something?
 
Hitler also said that they would never be able to invade America because there was "a gun for every blade of grass".

Quote from LEAPup:

I just can't let this one go. Did you know that Japanese Commanders admitted during their surrender in WWII said, WE DIDN'T INVADE THE US AS WE KNEW THE CIVILLIANS HAD GUNS, AND A MISSION LIKE THAT WOULD HAVE FAILED.

And did you know that the 2nd Amendment makes the rest possible? i.e., armed citizens CAN keep the government in check if they decide to do so.

Good God! Are you in a mental lockup or something?
More...
 
Quote from shortie:

if the attacker comes to you with a knife and you shoot him dead, will you have hard time in court justifying your action? maybe not, but i am sure there are plenty of cases where the attacker ended up to be the victim in court's eyes.
More...

Better to be judged by twelve, than carried by six. :)
 
Quote from Artful D0dger:

Hitler also said that they would never be able to invade America because there was "a gun for every blade of grass".
More...

CORRECT!!!! I just can't understand the liberal idiotic shit I read and hear these days about people in the US not needing guns. If they only knew how naive they really are...
 
Quote from Maverick74:

Shortie has no intention of having a serious conversation so take that with a grain of salt. ...
More...

as I said Type1 and Type2 have deeply engraved reasons to be one or the other. The only way to really sway the gun law one way or the other is to convert somebody into the opposite type, which is not easy.

Different types of tactics could be tried to attempt to achieve this.

one strategy Type1 (Mav) or Type2 may engage in is to try to discredit his opponent...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top