What evidence do you have to say it's not a long time for an investigation, let's play your game.
WSJ : “Mr. Comey was concerned by information showing potential evidence of collusion”
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
What evidence do you have to say it's not a long time for an investigation, let's play your game.
You've answered your own question previously. The Watergate investigation took years. Hell, all investigations in government are slow.
I know what I said, I am asking what evidence did you have to say that six months is not a long time
Precedent on legal trials/investigations in the government.
Triggering in 3...2....1...
Clapper is not in charge of the FBI investigation but nice try - he said he had no knowledge what the FBI is doing
You are just 'reporting' that, that's conjecture and no proof.
You stepped in it LOL
It's not conjecture at all. Do you even understand what the word means? Proof - the Watergate investigation lasted years. It is verifiable and largely accepted. That is the definition of "fact".
Funny how being on top of facts is suddenly not appreciated by you
"At the May 8 hearing, Clapper said he wasn’t even aware of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives until March 20. He then explained why he would not have known that when he was the director of national intelligence."
http://www.factcheck.org/2017/05/trumps-nothing-see-spin/
Clapper didn't even knew there was an FBI investigation but you guys are going to use him as proof that there is no evidence? LMFAO