WSJ : “Mr. Comey was concerned by information showing potential evidence of collusion”

[Tsing Tao]

Congress is a government agency???????????

HAhahahahahahahah

Thanks for the quotable quote




Nobody used the word possibly, that's your justifying your anchoring.

You know what I mean. Both are government. You're looking for any possible grammar, punctuation or word usage error in order to claim victory. I'm still focused on the fact that there's no proof at all that has been published on collusion. One of us is nitpicking, the other has content.

Let me know if you ever have proof. Keep that wall manned, that candle lit, and the prayers going, Waggie.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

I'm not Flynn, thankfully. When I see proof, I'll happily embrace it. Conjecture, though, that's just more spam. Been seeing plenty of that for months.

Meanwhile, all these goings on are passing the smell test for you?

It's interesting that you were ready to bury the Clintons on far less. Perhaps you have a soft spot for Vlado?

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Maybe, maybe not. Until you have proof, it's just speculation.

Right, you're the arbiter of truth, fairness and The American Way. You won't point any fingers and will remain completely unfazed until the proof is rubbed directly on your face in a circular and exfoliating fashion. Except, of course, when it comes to Democrats.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Right, you're the arbiter of truth, fairness and The American Way. You won't point any fingers and will remain completely unfazed until the proof is rubbed directly on your face in a circular and exfoliating fashion. Except, of course, when it comes to Democrats.

I seem to recall asking for proof on a number of occasions when folks on the right around here were quick to accuse. Here is one of them.

I would agree that the Obama administration is probably the most hostile administration in history to Israel and that it would certainly be plausible for them to re-introduce this resolution. I'm just looking for a source on that assertion. Israel claims to have this evidence. Where is it?

And after that:

Yeah. Or a source, or something. I mean, we can't go around laughing at the democrats for their accusations on Russia hacking the election and asking for proof, and then turn around and say Obama designed this resolution and there is proof, but not show it.

We can, I suppose, but it looks rather hypocritical.

I tend to fall back on the whole "Innocent until proven guilty". I'll call out when I believe something to be true, but you'd be right to call me out on that and ask where the proof is. It's actually the Justice System that is the arbiter of truth, and the same that requires evidence to convict. I'm sorry if that doesn't follow your own personal protocol.

I get that you're really, really pissed off about this whole thing, and you really want there to be proof. But that doesn't make it magically appear.

 

[fhl]

12 times Dems, Repubs said no evidence
of Trump-Russia collusion;
10 times people claimed there was
SharylAttkisson.com, by Sharyl Attkisson