Got to love how you and so many others are experts on something you know jack shit about.
I'm very clear about what I brought to the table. You're not, because you don't have the faintest clue about what I have. The programmer also received full disclosure and demonstration about what I brought to the table, so if he wasn't interested or didn't believe in it, he should have turned it down then.
Protecting what I have is a number one priority as there's virtually zero reason I'd share any proprietary research or system of any value with anyone else. But you'll see so called price action traders "share" all the time. No wonder they don't have any issue with that as it's public knowledge that's as old as the hills and probably not worth much anyway.
The genuine concern expressed in the first post in this thread was how I was guaranteed that the programmer would deliver AFTER he knew the details and could just keep it to himself afterwards.
For all we know that's what happened. I doubt it, though, as he seemed too dense to grasp it all.
LOL. Okay. Good for you. Not sure how that's relevant to me or anyone else reading this thread.
By the way - funny how you blocked me earlier for calling you out on your shitty and condescending attitude and now you're lifting the block just so you can reply to me in this thread.
Make up your mind already.
Anytime a client brings this kind of energy to a project up front it's a red flag to being involved. I offered some expert level advice that went way over your head. So be it.
Last edited: