No one. There has only been alt-Right innuendo, which is a staple for Trump. He is trying to take the spotlight off of the Sessions thing with a "Look over there!"Has anyone provided any solid evidence that Trump was wiretapped? I haven't seen it, so I'm asking.
No one. There has only been alt-Right innuendo, which is a staple for Trump. He is trying to take the spotlight off of the Sessions thing with a "Look over there!"
Meanwhile he is embarrassing himself both at home and abroad.
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/w...laim-that-obama-ordered-wiretap-of-his-phones
The man has no regard for the institutions of his own country. He's going scorched-earth. Trump has, and always had, the rectitude of a desperate and drowning man, in that he will pull down anyone if it will give him a moment of buoyancy.
False equivalence. Follow the breadcrumbs; they imply a tale that bears looking into. No single thing taken in isolation may mean much, but add them up and they point in a single direction. Only a fool would ignore the possible implications and ignore them without further investigation.In my opinion, this is no different than the claim he is tied to the Russians. No proof, just statements and agenda. Trump needs to put up some evidence or shut up on the subject. Making himself look like a jackass (unless, of course, he has proof).
False equivalence. Follow the breadcrumbs; they imply a tale that bears looking into. No single thing taken in isolation may mean much, but add them up and they point in a single direction. Only a fool would ignore the possible implications and ignore them without further investigation.
Meanwhile, Trump passes as fact whatever the alt-Right pulls out of its ass.
False equivalence. Follow the breadcrumbs; they imply a tale that bears looking into. No single thing taken in isolation may mean much, but add them up and they point in a single direction. Only a fool would ignore the possible implications and ignore them without further investigation.
Meanwhile, Trump passes as fact whatever the alt-Right pulls out of its ass.
One has an underlying basis with some critical mass behind it in the way of factual footprints and many of them. The other came from nowhere and is being used to divert the attention of those who don't know any better.You can say it's false equivalence all you like. But neither you nor I have the full view of the playing field and what is out there. Bread crumbs in the media are nothing more than editorials without basis of any fact. No proof that he was tied to Russia, and no proof that Obama wiretapped Trump as he claims. Can't pick one or the other just because you like the narrative, fair is fair.
Unless, of course, something surfaces that shows proof.
One has an underlying basis with some critical mass behind it in the way of factual footprints and many of them. The other came from nowhere and is being used to divert the attention of those who don't know any better.