You call it the "considered judgment of the collective intelligence community" and I call it "previous administration appointees pushing a narrative from the Deep State with no proof whatsoever". And yes, I'm equating that with Trump's baseless (thus far) claim as being equally wrong with neither one having a shred of proof presented.
Wiretapping: New Event Introduced
- Thread starter Spectre2007
- Start date
You call it the "considered judgment of the collective intelligence community" and I call it "previous administration appointees pushing a narrative from the Deep State with no proof whatsoever". And yes, I'm equating that with Trump's baseless (thus far) claim as being equally wrong with neither one having a shred of proof presented.
Gosh, yes. Thank you.
Well, I'm pretty sure we'll find out in due course which one of us has better judgment.
Perhaps, perhaps not. It's not a question of who has better judgment. It's a difference in philosophy. You are more inclined to believe the main stream media, whereas I require evidence and mistrust them.
I've stated many times (too many to count now) that if proof is presented, I will gladly change my thought process.
Nurse Ratched... "One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest".
In the absence of perfect information, I will give more weight to the more credible source for what "information" there is. At least in the interim. I consider the intelligence community to be more credible than amped-up radio jockeys. Few people in the intelligence community are political appointees. Most of them are lifers who may have personal opinions, but take some pride in their work. They have served under several administrations. You are summarily dismissing them with contempt.
We'll only know for sure when the full wash comes out. But that doesn't mean we have to necessarily be blindly bumping our heads into walls until that time. I suppose that's where our best judgment comes in.