Will this FINALLY make MSFT worth investing in?

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/g_txF7iETX0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/g_txF7iETX0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

First off, I am not a shill for MS -- I am far from it.

However, if they can actually pull this off...wow...

Furthermore, since they have already begun adding more features to their gaming console, the Xbox 360, that allows you to watch Netflix, listen to Pandora.com, and eventually access Hulu.com and CBS.com (the PS3 can do the same features with the exception of Netflix), could future consoles from the likes of MS, Sony, and even Nintendo, cut into the profit margins of companies like Comcast and Time Warner?

I mean, as of right now, because of Hulu and Torrents, I canceled my cable subscription (but not the internet). When systems of the future come out with these features, how much longer will it be until less techno-savvy people begin to do the same thing?

Discuss.


video is from the original blog post found here:
http://procrastineering.blogspot.com/2009/06/project-natal.html

Article:

---------------------------------------------
If you've been wondering why my project blog has been pretty quiet, I can finally say it is because I have been helping Xbox with Project Natal. If you haven't seen the vision video, it is definitely worth checking out:

--[VIDEO]--

Now, I should preface by saying I don't deserve credit for anything that you saw at E3. A large team of very smart, very hard working people were involved in building the demos you saw on stage. The part I am working on has much more to do with making sure this can transition from the E3 stage to your living room - for which there is an even larger team of very smart, very hard working people involved. The other thing I should say is that I can't really reveal any details that haven't already been made public. Unfortunately.

Speaking as someone who has been working in interface and sensing technology for nearly 10 years, this is an astonishing combination of hardware and software. The few times I’ve been able to show researchers the underlying components, their jaws drop with amazement... and with good reason.

The 3D sensor itself is a pretty incredible piece of equipment providing detailed 3D information about the environment similar to very expensive laser range finding systems but at a tiny fraction of the cost. Depth cameras provide you with a point cloud of the surface of objects that is fairly insensitive to various lighting conditions allowing you to do things that are simply impossible with a normal camera.

pointcloud.jpg


But once you have the 3D information, you then have to interpret that cloud of points as "people". This is where the researcher jaws stay dropped. The human tracking algorithms that the teams have developed are well ahead of the state of the art in computer vision in this domain. The sophistication and performance of the algorithms rival or exceed anything that I've seen in academic research, never mind a consumer product. At times, working on this project has felt like a miniature “Manhattan project” with developers and researchers from around the world coming together to make this happen.

We would all love to one day have our own personal holodeck. This is a pretty measurable step in that direction.

Xbox and Microsoft deserve an enormous amount of credit for taking on such an ambitious project. It’s one thing to say “Wouldn’t it be cool if…”, but it’s another thing entirely to say, “let’s dedicate the resources to really make it happen inventing whatever needs to be invented along the way.” I have to say it's pretty neat building the future.
 
You are talking about a company that has never innovated anything or created anything original.

Demos are just promotion. Demos of Vista made it look like the best operating system ever. It ended up being a joke & failure.
 
Quote from Anaconda:

You are talking about a company that has never innovated anything or created anything original.

Demos are just promotion. Demos of Vista made it look like the best operating system ever. It ended up being a joke & failure.

Project Natal was not created by Microsoft. If was really created by this guy:
http://procrastineering.blogspot.com/

Johnny Chung is known in the gaming world for his many videos where he hacked the Nintendo Wii, and turned it basically into a virtual reality machine by modifying the remote and system in weird and unique ways:

http://johnnylee.net/projects/wii/

He graduated from Carnegie Mellon University with a PhD in Human-Computer Interaction.

When he finally got his Doctorate, he asked to work at Nintendo, and story goes is that he was turned down.

Microsoft then snatched him up.

By the way, the Natal is NOT an overgrown tech demo:

http://kotaku.com/5276789/from-stick-figure-to-mind+blowing-controls

http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2009/06/project-natal/

If this were a MS production ONLY, then I would have passed it off (and Vista is not as bad as everyone keeps trying to say it is, although MS did screw up by offering 5 versions of the same program thereby confusing everyone).

It is not.

Just take a look at what this guy has done by looking at the links above, and you will see what I mean.
 
Quote from Unhommefou:

Project Natal was not created by Microsoft. If was really created by this guy:
http://procrastineering.blogspot.com/

Johnny Chung is known in the gaming world for his many videos where he hacked the Nintendo Wii, and turned it basically into a virtual reality machine by modifying the remote and system in weird and unique ways:

http://johnnylee.net/projects/wii/

He graduated from Carnegie Mellon University with a PhD in Human-Computer Interaction.

When he finally got his Doctorate, he asked to work at Nintendo, and story goes is that he was turned down.

Microsoft then snatched him up.

By the way, the Natal is NOT an overgrown tech demo:

http://kotaku.com/5276789/from-stick-figure-to-mind+blowing-controls

http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2009/06/project-natal/

If this were a MS production ONLY, then I would have passed it off (and Vista is not as bad as everyone keeps trying to say it is, although MS did screw up by offering 5 versions of the same program thereby confusing everyone).

It is not.

Just take a look at what this guy has done by looking at the links above, and you will see what I mean.

No, actually, it wasn't created by that guy either. The system is based on a company MSFT acquired awhile ago that has a revolutionary video camera device. It is able to capture the Z plane (if you remember basic math, the XY plane is two dimensional, the Z plane adds depth) and translate it on the fly to create a 3d image bitmap representation of the object in front of it.
 
the only thing worth investing in that video is the girl in the red pants. when shes 21 she'll be a hottie. holllllaaa
 
Gentleman, as some of you may or may not know, this little idea applies to current hardware, all you need is the new eye response camera that is already on the market. It's hardly going to ramp up earnings as it doesn't require existing owners to buy a new console as one would logically presume. Carry on dividend investors, traders keep it moving =)
 
Quote from mililani:

The system is based on a company MSFT acquired awhile ago that has a revolutionary video camera device.

Then expect Microsoft to screw it up as much as possible. That is generally what they do with acquired IP.

Both Sony & MSFT are doing this, they had exhibits at E3. It's just standard progression in the video game world. It will be progressively implemented, not a big breakthrough revolution..

Frankly, after seeing that retarded family demo, somehow I am turned off. Well that's not true, the MILF & daughter duo were a very nice selection.
 
Back
Top