proven by statistics.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...d-the-math-explaining-active-manager-futility
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...d-the-math-explaining-active-manager-futility
please explain .2 words--
Asymmetrical information
You sounding more and more like rickards.2 words--
Asymmetrical information
Dude management fees are 1%, 2% if you're a retail (and the fund usually pays the 1% to the distributor) and more 0.5% if you're institutional.I believe fund managers are out for themselves, anyone disagree? So what is going rate of management fee that is percentage of entire account? 4%, 5%, 6% ???
SO, for example have small 1 million account and you being manager, made 20% return for the clients which comes to $200,000 and you charging 6% management fee paid end of the year your fund made $72,000 plus 20% of new profits manager makes which comes to $40,000, so the fund made more than the manager, and why I think cuts into why many funds don't beat the S&P500 Index, you want to make enough so people don't bail on your fund and yet the fund makes more than the clients.
If you actually listen to what the guy says, this relates only to mutual funds and stock pickers. Hedge funds = credit, distressed, private equity, managed futures, etc.proven by statistics.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...d-the-math-explaining-active-manager-futility