You're saying the right never said, "I'm glad the Russians hacked the DNC, fed wikileaks, and exposed the "corruption""? Is that what you're saying?
First of all, the right genuinely believes the Russians DID NOT hack the DNC.
It's not as if they believe the Russians did, and don't care.
Today, my client echoed exactly what you are implying.
Since her household is a PC household, i can't say anything without jeopardizing my job.
(I'm considering charging a half hour of time, every time she insults the President within earshot, or comes off repeating something from mad Rachel Maddow, intending to get a rise out of me).
So i'll say it here.
Apples to oranges.
If the Russians got hold of DNC and fed to Wikileaks, that's called espionage, and it's as "illegal" as espionage can be.
Nevermind there is no evidence of that.
In this case, with Flynn, there is irrefutable evidence that U.S. intel was involved in illegal espionage, if not with the recording of the call itself, certainly with the leak of the calls contents, or the leak of a DESCRIPTION of the contents.
Foreign espionage is almost expected.
Domestic espionage is a whole other ball game, and illegal as all hell, especially when it's apparent purpose is to crank up a lucrative cold, or hot, war(s).
But if you want to maintain a prissy tit-for-tat attitude, enjoy the time you have left before the bombs start dropping.
