why the hell futures lower then cash ???

Sorry....The stock number in your replication question? Is that it? Is that you question?

If so... I'm not into classical replication the returns these days are so minuscule at these VOL levels that I ignore it almost all of the time however this a guess and only a guess only maybe the first 80 or 90 names will probably encompass at least %90-95 of all the SPOOS.

But that's hardly my concern. That's academic nonsense.... I'm looking for traders who have moved beyond that a just a bit.
 
I am not interested in working for you so lets dismiss that.

Have fun crossing 80 to 90 stocks to replicate the index.

Okay you can return to your over the top arrogance. Quite frankly I find it amusing that you come across so smug and at the same time believe you’re going to find a qualified person on an anonymous web board.

Have a nice weekend!
 
That's what i was thinking at first. About 275 stocks if that's true.

http://www.indexarb.com/indexComponentWtsSP500.html

I'm guessing in reality it's possible to get by with a lot less maybe the top 100 by mkt cap.

Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:

Sorry....The stock number in your replication question? Is that it? Is that you question?

If so... I'm not into classical replication the returns these days are so minuscule at these VOL levels that I ignore it almost all of the time however this a guess and only a guess only maybe the first 80 or 90 names will probably encompass at least %90-95 of all the SPOOS.

But that's hardly my concern. That's academic nonsense.... I'm looking for traders who have moved beyond that a just a bit.
More...
 
The problem with 275 is massive friction and slippage. Unless one operates from their own dark pool. But anyway...I don't care about all that anymore.

Just a fish hook thrown out...came up emtpy. That's cool.



Quote from blackchip:

That's what i was thinking at first. About 275 stocks if that's true.

http://www.indexarb.com/indexComponentWtsSP500.html

I'm guessing in reality it's possible to get by with a lot less maybe the top 100 by mkt cap.
More...
 
All the mystery and drama's just great, but can we assume neither of you know the answer? :D

Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:

The problem with 275 is massive friction and slippage. Unless one operates from their own dark pool. But anyway...I don't care about all that anymore.

Just a fish hook thrown out...came up emtpy. That's cool.
More...
 
Quote from cvds16:

what a bunch of f*cking morons here in this thread (with the exception of two or three persons) who claim to be traders and know shit ! ! ! :eek: :eek: :eek:
It's because of the dividends clueless retards (yes, that feels good). No wonder you people don't make money.
More...

Listen cvds, you flaming Flemish fomenter: a fair value delta discount is more a function of 1) relatively low short term rates and 2) fewer days remaining to expiration which correspondingly decreases the interest component.

A discount scenario typically is more about the interest than the dividends.

If you are going to be insulting, it is better to be correct. Otherwise you look like, I believe your term is, a fucking moron or clueless retard.

a haiku for cvds:

momma always said
if you live in a glass house
better not throw stones
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top