why the hell futures lower then cash ???

what a bunch of f*cking morons here in this thread (with the exception of two or three persons) who claim to be traders and know shit ! ! ! :eek: :eek: :eek:
It's because of the dividends clueless retards (yes, that feels good). No wonder you people don't make money.
 
Show of hands...who here actually makes their daily bread on the difference between the Futs and Cash? Not as an Indicator to execute something else ...but those who execute Futs or Cash on the basis of relative misalignment?

Thank you.
 
Quote from ScottD:

That can be true on a brief transient basis, but it’s relatively quickly corrected by Arb Programs. Just because cash is higher than futures, does not mean that the outlook is less than rosy. It typically means that the dividends are higher than the cost of carry interest for the remainder of the contract.

The main reason an index’s cash price can be higher than its futures price for the bulk of a trading day is that the fair value delta can be negative – i.e., a discount instead of a premium.

Futures price = cash price + fair value delta (where the delta can be negative)

Fair value delta = interest - dividends (where dividends can be greater than interest)

The interest is the carry cost for owning all the stocks from now until contract expiration. The appropriate short term rates from the yield curve are used, for example 3-month LIBOR. From the perspective of the futures contract holder, the interest is essentially gained because you don’t have to borrow from your bank or broker to own all the securities.

The dividends are those that happen from now until contract expiration. From the perspective of the futures contract holder, the dividends are effectively lost because you own the futures contract instead of the securities.

The input values are adjusted proportionally for the remaining life of the 3-month contract.

Thanks for the clear, straight to the point explanation. Well done! More posters like you are needed to neutralize all the BS that is injected into this site on a daily basis.
 
Text book

Now can we make any money on this?

Quote from ScottD:

That can be true on a brief transient basis, but it’s relatively quickly corrected by Arb Programs. Just because cash is higher than futures, does not mean that the outlook is less than rosy. It typically means that the dividends are higher than the cost of carry interest for the remainder of the contract.

The main reason an index’s cash price can be higher than its futures price for the bulk of a trading day is that the fair value delta can be negative – i.e., a discount instead of a premium.

Futures price = cash price + fair value delta (where the delta can be negative)

Fair value delta = interest - dividends (where dividends can be greater than interest)

The interest is the carry cost for owning all the stocks from now until contract expiration. The appropriate short term rates from the yield curve are used, for example 3-month LIBOR. From the perspective of the futures contract holder, the interest is essentially gained because you don’t have to borrow from your bank or broker to own all the securities.

The dividends are those that happen from now until contract expiration. From the perspective of the futures contract holder, the dividends are effectively lost because you own the futures contract instead of the securities.

The input values are adjusted proportionally for the remaining life of the 3-month contract.
 
Shall I ask again??


What do you think is a reasonable number of stocks to have in your replication basket for arb'n the SnP 500 ? Or heck pick the index you like and list your number of replication stocks for the basket.
 
Unless you can compete for capital and transaction costs with firms like GS, it's unlikely you can do it in a statistically meaningful manner.

Plus dey got dem really big 'puters.

Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:

Text book

Now can we make any money on this?
 
Rest assured there are ways....

I'm looking for someone who I don't have to teach.

Quote from blackchip:

Unless you can compete for capital and transaction costs with firms like GS, it's unlikely you can do it in a statistically meaningful manner.

Plus dey got dem really big 'puters.
 
Back
Top